New Jersey V. T. L. O. Case Study

Improved Essays
In the 1984 case of New Jersey v T.L.O., a fourteen year old freshman student’s attorney argues that evidence collected by school officials should be excluded due to a violation of the student’s Fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable search and seizure. The student and her friend were caught smoking cigarettes in the restroom of the high school by a teacher, and escorted to the principal’s office. After claiming that she was not a smoker, the principal demanded that she reveal the contents of her purse. Upon opening the purse, the principal found not only cigarettes; but, marijuana, drug paraphernalia, a substantial amount of money, and a list of other students that owed her money. The defense’s motion to exclude was denied at both the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today the land taken in the City of New London lies empty, as a result of the failing plans the NLDC constructed to economically revitalize New London. The Kelo v. City of New London case faced tremendous backlash because it allowed the federal government to seize anyone's property for supposed economic improvement rather than actual public use. This unintended backlash was so strong causing a majority of states to pass laws that were aimed at nullifying Kelo-style takings of private property. Richard Palmer, one of the state supreme court justices who voted with the majority, later apologized to Susette Kelo, telling her he “would have voted differently” had he known what would happen. (Somin).…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the case of Sala et al v. Warwick Valley Central School District (2009), John Sala, Jr., a high school senior, was dismissed from his high school football team. Sala was arrested after police came to a friend’s house to find Sala and his friends in the presence of alcohol and marijuana. Following the arrest, he was suspended from the football team for the rest of the season. While serving the suspension, the District Athletic Director corrected Sala for speeding in the school parking lot, and he accused Sala of cursing at him in response. Sala was also ticketed for driving past the curfew of his license.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Kelo v. New London court case, Suzette Kelo and eight petitioners opposed a eminent domain taking “projected to create in excess of 1,000 jobs, to increase tax and other revenues, and to revitalize an economically distressed city” (“Kelo” 472). Suzette Kelo claimed the “extensive improvements” that she had made on her house justified her ability to block this development plan (476). Others claimed that their “investment properties,” because they were not “blighted or otherwise in poor condition,” could not be taken by the government (476). Do Kelo’s and the other defendants’ claim to their property through proper maintenance and labor supersede the governments right to repossess the properties for economic development?…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was not any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the search of the cell phone. The contents of the bag, including a vaseline jar and a sandwich wrapper, do not give reasonable grounds for the search of the phone. If Sanders and Turpin found no marijuana on L.O.L. and sent him back to class, what was the purpose of keeping his cell phone as there was no reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Similarly in the case G.C. v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013), the Sixth circuit had ruled against the school’s search of the student’s cell phone.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kelo vs City of New London Kelo v. City of New London case involved the of abuse eminent domain by transferring land from one private owner to another (private owner) in the name of economic development. The case was judged by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court decided that private redevelopment plans can be considered "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment as they benefited the general community because of economic growth qualified as a permissible. The issue started when in 1998 pharmaceutical giant Pfizer constructed a plant near Fort Trumbull.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas police were dispatched to Lawrence's apartment complex in response to a reported weapons disturbance. Houston police entered Lawrence's apartment and saw him and another man, Garner, engaging in a consensual sexual act. The case began with the arrest of a Houston resident, John Lawrence. Lawrence and Garner were detained and held in police custody overnight. Both men were charged with violating the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court's decision in New Verses versus T.L.O was that the search was legal and that it didn't violate the 4th amendment. The Court also held that school officials need "responsible suspicion" instead of a higher level of "probable cause" and that such a warrant wasn't needed. There should be "responsible suspicion" since students still have some rights at schools, and without a "responsible suspicion", the school officials would be breaking the Fourth Amendment. Yes, the Supreme Court's decision was the correct one because students should have some rights when at school, but if associated with what could lead to a bigger consequence or investigation, the school officials should be able to search and do what they can without a warrant…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is clear the evolution that the fourth amendment has carried throughout the years. In the court case regarding TLO v. New Jersey, the girl thought her rights were violated, but she just broke the rules and a search was conducted. In the case where the boys phone was confiscated and searched is an example of some loopholes that the fourth amendment has in schools. In certain circumstances you have to use the judgment that got you the job and take it from there. The school that the child attends will never be looked at the same by its students, based on the fact that the students cannot trust the school system.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The major industry in the town was sports, which led the school district to apply the drug policy only to their major influencers, the athletes. The case takes place after a similar case, New Jersey v. T.L.O., which also dealt with “searching” in public schools. Many of the points made in New Jersey v. T.L.O. were also brought up in Vernonia v. Acton. The ninth circuit court that overturned the other rulings said that the “Student Athlete Drug Policy” violated the fourth amendment as well as Article 1, Section 9 of the Oregon…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because the school made her do a strip search to see if drugs were hidden in places that they could not touch themselves, and also her belongings. The belongings were not the part in which her parents were mad about because her daughter gave consent. However, the strip search made the parents feel like their daughter’s fourth amendment was violated, and also made…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The New Jersey Plan Essay

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What type of representation did the New Jersey Plan call for? The type of representation the New Jersey Plan call for is the “equal representation” where even though the population of each states are different, they will still have the same number of representatives for their state. A federal government with only one legislative body which was based on the idea of equal representation that is having two senators despite the size of the state and its population. 2)…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Essay

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    T.L.O. may have had illegal items in her possession, but the search conducted by the school was unlawful, unreasonable, and violated two Amendments in the Constitution of the United States of America. T.L.O. suffered many charges pressed against her in the lower level courts, so she has now been brought to The Supreme Court’s attention. T.L.O. was first discovered smoking in a school lavatory along with an acquaintance by a teacher. Her accomplice admitted to smoking but T.L.O. denied it. She was brought…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It also protects the right that the court cannot makes laws that deprive citizens of their rights. " Gitlow v. New York. " Gitlow v. New York, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 8, 1925, that the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protection of free speech, which states that the federal “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech,” applied also to state governments.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays