New Jersey Supreme Court Case Summary

Decent Essays
Year: Ended 1985
How the Case Arrived to Supreme Court: A student in attendance of a New Jersey high school was caught smoking in a bathroom by one of her teachers. When brought before the vice principal, the student denied having been smoking, and stated that she didn't smoke at all. In response to this falsity, the vice principal demanded the student’s purse and searched it thoroughly discovering along with the cigarettes, evidence that the student was taking part in drug dealing. The State thereafter brought charges of delinquency against the student, stating that school searches were included in the fourth amendment but that the one performed at the school was justified. However, it was overturned subsequently after a closer analyzation of the occurrence.
…show more content…
The instance was inconsistent with the principles of privacy designated to all American citizens including students
Court’s Decision: In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school’s actions in a vote of 6-3. The court stated that the Fourth Amendment was not violated in this particular situation as the school has a right to search a student if reasonable doubt is present that order is at stake in an educational environment. The student was putting herself and other students in jeopardy through her actions, justifying the search of her property. This case gave teachers the right to search students’ belongings for drugs or weapons to keep the learning environment safe thereby improving the learning environment universally across the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    New Jersey countered saying that the cigarettes warranted the assistant vice principal reason to continue his search. The court decided that though the vice principal did indeed step over the line when searching the purse after already finding the incriminating evidence, but if it were not for this he would not have found the drugs. They believed that the rights of the school and the students right to privacy should not overlap but weigh…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court thus reversed the Court of Appeals of Maryland’s judgment and the case has been remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was not any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the search of the cell phone. The contents of the bag, including a vaseline jar and a sandwich wrapper, do not give reasonable grounds for the search of the phone. If Sanders and Turpin found no marijuana on L.O.L. and sent him back to class, what was the purpose of keeping his cell phone as there was no reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Similarly in the case G.C. v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013), the Sixth circuit had ruled against the school’s search of the student’s cell phone.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I, Supreme Court Justice, Floyd McLeod, find in favor of Mohammed Achman. This case has proved to me that Mr. Achman 's rights as an U.S. citizen were violated multiple times. To go more in depth; on September 27, 2001, approximately two weeks after the terrorist attack of the World Trade Center, America, especially New York ,were on edge in finding any little details to get to the bottom of the attack and any future attacks. Unfortunately, the Achman 's felt the wrath and discrimination from American civilians. It all started with people breaking one of his windows to his store and destroying his mosque in queens.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court's decision in New Verses versus T.L.O was that the search was legal and that it didn't violate the 4th amendment. The Court also held that school officials need "responsible suspicion" instead of a higher level of "probable cause" and that such a warrant wasn't needed. There should be "responsible suspicion" since students still have some rights at schools, and without a "responsible suspicion", the school officials would be breaking the Fourth Amendment. Yes, the Supreme Court's decision was the correct one because students should have some rights when at school, but if associated with what could lead to a bigger consequence or investigation, the school officials should be able to search and do what they can without a warrant…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because the school made her do a strip search to see if drugs were hidden in places that they could not touch themselves, and also her belongings. The belongings were not the part in which her parents were mad about because her daughter gave consent. However, the strip search made the parents feel like their daughter’s fourth amendment was violated, and also made…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Study

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By law, school officials need to obtain a warrant before searching…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mr. Price Case Summary

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Price argues that being stopped and searched was violation of the 4th amendment. The evidence then should not have been admissible in court. Holding: In this case I ruled a dissenting opinion in favor of the Appellee (State of Colorado). Rationale:…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling, which occurred during the Vietnam War, granted the students the right to express their political opinions as long as they did not disrupt the classroom. Their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights could not be restricted based on a “general fear of disruption,” which is what the administration argued. According to Justice Fortas, who wrote the majority opinion, the protest was a “silent, passive expression of opinion.” Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Also, there had not been any findings that the armbands would substantially interfere with school operations or more importantly, harm the rights of other students.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    T. L. O. Case Essay

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the clearly states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (“Fourth Amendment”). Its laws also apply to searches done by public school officials. Public school officials, such as vice principal Theodore Choplick, are not exempt from the Amendment’s dictates by virtue of the special nature of their authority over schoolchildren. On the other hand, school officials represent the State itself in carrying out searches such as this one and cannot claim the parents’ immunity from the Fourth Amendment. Vice principal Choplick not only violated T.L.O.’s Fourth Amendment rights, but also her Fifth Amendment rights.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court favor the school and said that is legal to do unreasonable searches and seizures, if it is disrupting the learning environment or is found smoking in school environment and the discovery of rolling papers near cigarette in her purse created suspicion that she might have marijuana or if the school has a suspicion, broke a rule, student committed or is committing a…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What were the two main findings in the PARC Case (1971)? The case of Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania consists in a sue against a state law which denied access to education to children with disabilities who have not reached the 5 year old mental developmental. The two main findings in this case are the right of students with mental retardation to receive free public education and, as long as possible, include this kind of students in a regular classroom rather than an isolated special class.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deal Vs Von Raab Summary

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What do the following five cases all have in common? (1) National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, (1989), (2) Deal v. Spears, (1992), (3) O’Connor v. Ortega, (1987), (4) Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Illinois Railroad, (NMB, July 3, 194) and (5) Anderson v. Philadelphia, (1998). The core issue for all five of these cases…the fourth amendment the United States Constitution. “The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law” ("What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean?" n.d.).…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays