Neutral Question

1359 Words 5 Pages
Questions are a powerful tool. They lead to insight, inspiration, revelation and change. However, if a question is misused, it can not only be extremely unhelpful, it can be ultimately damaging. For that reason, when embarking on a dramaturged life, it is important to ask the right kind of question. What exactly is the “right kind” of question. Well, in this context, the “right kind” of question is a neutral question. The neutral question is one of the greatest tools and is capable of leading us to amazing discoveries. A neutral question is asked in such a way that it does not imply personal opinion or bias. Neutrality is defined as the state of not supporting or helping either side in a conflict, disagreement; impartiality. Depending on …show more content…
We use science as a mean of progress. According to Webster 's New Collegiate Dictionary, the definition of science is "knowledge attained through study or practice.” Every action taken in the scientific field is with the assumption of an end-goal. We as a society growing and developing on a daily bases and we are aiming to advance in all aspects of life; Therefore, any scientific question we ask leads to an answer. For example, the scientific method is a design of processes that is used to set up, create and test a new experiment or idea. The first step is to deduce a hypothesis. There are clear intentions as to where we hope and plan to end before we actually begin our expedient. We have this goal in mind from the beginning of the experiment and every step after this leads us to our conclusion, even if the results do not play out in the favor of the the one asking. A research question and a hypothesis must be formed to start, say, “Is autism a kind of brain damage,” and we use our hypothesis, whether correct or incorrect,to predict what we believe the outcome will be. This makes the …show more content…
The collaboration and corroboration of information rely heavily on historical investigation and the experiences, stories and facts that are justified by a collective acceptance and by popular beliefs. Bias is involved in many aspects of History as interpretation of these significant events vary. I will begin with the question, "to what extent was the Battle of Verdun a French victory?” This is a question that is considered to be 'neutral’ because of the words, “to what extent.” We are lead to deem that it will observe all of the viewpoints in order to determine the truth. From this we immediately arrive at the idea that the Battle was a win by the French, but is that the truth? We are lead to believe that it was a French victory, but what does that mean? This can be perceived in numerous variations: the Battle of Verdun was a win in the physical sense, that the German’s were defeated in combat by the French; another approach is that the French won in a mental sense, that because of this the French gained knowledge that later helped them in life and was considered a win to their culture in the long run; and some, without the necessary historical knowledge, may even speculate that the French we defeated in the battle but after a series of unfortunate events this bolstered them and because if this ‘catastrophe’ the nation prospered. This question guides us to

Related Documents