Net Neutrality Laws

Improved Essays
Imagine this. You’re sitting at home on your nice, warm, comfy couch. You’re surfing the Web, checking out your friends’ posts on Instagram, or maybe even sending a few Snaps to your crush. You decide that you want to watch an episode or two of Stranger Things on Netflix (let’s be honest, you’re going watch way more than just two), when all of a sudden, on the screen of your phone pops up a red and white banner that says, “This content has been blocked by your internet service provider. We are sorry for the inconvenience. For questions, please call 1-800…” and so on. Netflix has been blocked and YOU have just become victim to a world without Net Neutrality laws.
Net Neutrality is what keeps the Internet equal and fair. It is the principle
…show more content…
Let’s talk about the benefits of Net Neutrality laws. First, Net Neutrality allows us to view whatever we want whenever we want for no extra price. Let’s illustrate this by continuing with your story.
After seeing this horrible sight of blocked Netflix, you decide to give your ISP a call, let’s say its Comcast. The Comcast customer support answers and you explain the problem your having while trying to access Netflix, and also how annoyed you are because you can’t watch the great show you were about to watch. This is what they say in response: “We’re sorry for this inconvenience you are having, but sadly Netflix has been blocked for Comcast users because of the inappropriate content found on the site, but if you would like we could allow Netflix to be unblocked for you with a small fee of $9.99 a month.”
Honestly, this would be infuriating, and I’m sure you would think so too. But that is the real power that has been given to ISPs. They can charge us more money so that we can access the websites that we know and love. This is not a good thing for Internet users at all. We want our freedom to use the Internet however we please. The only way that we can achieve that is through Net

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The term net neutrality was first coined back in the year of 2003 by Columbia University media law professor Tim Wu as an extension the concept of a common carrier. The basic principle definition is that there should be Internet equality for everyone regardless of content, platform, application, attached equipment, or mode of communication. It is essentially a type of civil rights movement for the use of the Internet. It also means that no phone company can limit what you can access on your phone such as text, certain apps, and Internet usage. For example in 2007 denied access for its users from sending donations via text messaging to an pro-choice abortion service citing that they as a company did not believe the campaign.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Network Neutrality Nuances, Barbara van Schewick argues her stance on network neutrality, and how without it we would be under the relentless abuse of our ISPs. By utilizing a multitude of examples and propositions, she manages to engross the reader in a series of possibilities of what could occur without network neutrality, and how it acts as a measure against discrimination Barbara starts off her point of view by firmly introducing us into net neutrality, and how it is basically the wall that stops a digital divide. Focusing on 3 subjects in specific, the piece introduces the reader to why we should worry about network neutrality, the incentives ISPs have to do it and why arguments against net neutrality are invalid. Barbara very convincingly…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Net neutrality allows citizens the right to access the same content as everyone else without blocking or slowing down that citizen’s bandwidth.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy around net neutrality is pretty common, many think the government shouldn’t be wanting the people to be paying so much for something that everyone uses in their everyday life for useful purposes, while the other portion aren’t aware of net neutrality and or they simply do not care. Net neutrality limits people from seeing what is fully out there which can potentially be a good idea or one of the worst ones yet. Paying for such a thing, and paying a good price and not getting what you fully pay for is frustrating yet calming. The government is wanting to protect the general population from seeing something most have most likely seen, knowing what is out there in the world is one of the most asked questions.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Net Neutrality Analysis

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages

    This is sadly shaping up to be a left versus right political fight. That’s unfortunate because there is nothing in the principle of net neutrality that is inherently left or right. On many similar issues we have had broad coalitions in the past recognize that market structure matters and that companies operating…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Net Neutrality: It Needs to Protected Introduction Research shows that net neutrality should be protected because it prevents the formation of ISP monopolies, provides protections to start-ups and small companies, and prevents ISPs from controlling access to internet content. But what is net neutrality? In 2003, the term net neutrality was used by Tim Wu - a professor at Columbia Law School. The core concept of net neutrality is that all data should be treated equally regardless of source, destination, or content (Jackson, 2014).…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Net Neutrality in Turmoil The internet has become a big part of daily life for many. “As of 2014, the number of internet users worldwide was 2.92 billion, up from 2.71 billion in the previous year” (Number). The usage of the internet may continue to grow or it may dwindle due to the lack of stability.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Furthermore, some posit that ISPs could charge for site specific access which could further limit open access to certain demographics of the population (Cook, 2014). Thus far, the issues…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Of course, this didn’t happen, but because of these fears, the new rules faced a lot of opposition. Those who thought it was unnecessary had thought processes like the process the Uwire author had where he stated that if AT&T, for example, imposed new restrictions on access to websites and services, customers would simply leave AT&T and go to a different provider and AT&T would suffer. What this author doesn’t take into account is that many people have only one high-speed ISP available to them, and thus when an ISP pushes out new restrictions and costs, they have no choice but to accept these new costs and restrictions. Under net neutrality laws, we wouldn’t have to deal with restricted access to websites and lowered speeds because the laws would prevent ISPs from imposing these restrictions and access to websites and services would be equal in every area. Explaining this to the public would lessen resistance to the new laws and increase support for the new laws.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comcast intentionally reduced the speed that users could download and watch their movies at, this legal crime…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marvin Ammori, a leading expert on net neutrality who put it into place, in the beginning, said before the announcement of the repeal of net neutrality “We’re about to lose net neutrality and the internet as we know it.” Marvin has been a leading voice working to save net neutrality. He is a prominent first amendment lawyer and thinks that along with those freedoms, should be the freedom of the internet. The internet is very new, and so the constitution needs to catch up to it. Laws like net neutrality were created to govern the internet and keep it free for everyone to use but if you take them away the internet could become a costly, controlled place where it is very hard to…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Richard Zheng Dr. Bruce Farcau POS 2041 18 November 2014 Net Neutrality: The Open Internet Since the very early days of the Internet, it had mostly been used for sending e-mails and basic communication online. However, as the years passed and the world wide web expanded further, more people began using the Internet for other services such as viewing informative and entertaining videos, enjoying their favorite music, playing unique games, and receiving countless sources of information.…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The youth of today is the society of tomorrow; raise them right, and the world will go on to be a better place. In order to do so, they must have a safe environment brought about by the suppression of ideas, words, or images that are generally considered offensive; this concept is most widely known as censorship and can be. Critically acclaimed, George Orwell’s 1984 is one of the most popular examples of censorship taken too far. However, 1984 does make a few good points when it comes to what should be hidden from public view. Some of the most common things censored are nudity and pornography, profanity, racial slurs, and other sensitive topics.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of net neutrality, an Obama-era regulation that prohibits internet service providers from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use, according to freepress.net, is a necessary rule that will keep citizens free and private and keep the internet neutral, hence the name. The law is necessary because without regulations, large corporations can monitor what we see on the internet, and there will be no way for us to know what is real and what is not. There will be no truth or freedom of press except what multinational, billionaire corporations want us to…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communication Act of 1934: A Critical Critique The author holds the assumption that the majority of Americans would not believe it to be true that the laws which govern access to the Internet were enacted prior to the start of World War 2.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays