Throughout human nature, people have always been conquering, striving for power and capital above any other objective; even if it means hurting others. Ethical ambiguity hasn’t come in mind to many since the modern age because of the potential of capitol people saw. Many companies to this day obey their practices by operating the right way without causing harm to others to promote a positive environment and loyalty to their consumers. One of the biggest modern-day water distributors (Nestle), has disappointingly been exposed for their importance of money over being responsible for putting infants in danger with unsainitaed baby formula. This report will analyze the ethical justifications and a possible solution to this issue.
…show more content…
Women would then feel wrong and not necessary to have their babies drink their breast milk at home or in public, which ends up weakening the natural bond between a human mother and their child. Also, with the continuous attempts of third world mothers trying to save money by diluting the formula, not having the resources for sterilization, and not being able to understand the word sterilization hurt many babies. The lack of water sterilization may make the babay’s more prone to waterborne illnesses such as typhoid, cholera, and bacterial/viral infections. A baby’s immune system and third world health care isn’t fully developed to fully fight off these illnesses, resulting in deaths. Finally, the continuous hooks to breast milk promoted by Nestle in maternity wards in hospitals make babies more dependant on that type of breastmilk. Breast Milk has many natural benefits lacking in formula which protects against bacterial meningitis, gastroenteritis, ear infections, respiratory infections ,diarrhea, and the necessary nutrients for neurological development. UNICEF estimates that a formula-fed child living in unhygienic conditions is between 6 and 25 times more likely to die of diarrhea and four times more likely to die of pneumonia than a breastfed child. So if nestle continues this promotion, many infants will die or grow up impaired from an easily preventable way which naturally belonged in their own mother’s. Also, this will promote an unnatural trend to where babies should get their milk from, which brainwashes a mother's instincts/bonds if this issue
Women would then feel wrong and not necessary to have their babies drink their breast milk at home or in public, which ends up weakening the natural bond between a human mother and their child. Also, with the continuous attempts of third world mothers trying to save money by diluting the formula, not having the resources for sterilization, and not being able to understand the word sterilization hurt many babies. The lack of water sterilization may make the babay’s more prone to waterborne illnesses such as typhoid, cholera, and bacterial/viral infections. A baby’s immune system and third world health care isn’t fully developed to fully fight off these illnesses, resulting in deaths. Finally, the continuous hooks to breast milk promoted by Nestle in maternity wards in hospitals make babies more dependant on that type of breastmilk. Breast Milk has many natural benefits lacking in formula which protects against bacterial meningitis, gastroenteritis, ear infections, respiratory infections ,diarrhea, and the necessary nutrients for neurological development. UNICEF estimates that a formula-fed child living in unhygienic conditions is between 6 and 25 times more likely to die of diarrhea and four times more likely to die of pneumonia than a breastfed child. So if nestle continues this promotion, many infants will die or grow up impaired from an easily preventable way which naturally belonged in their own mother’s. Also, this will promote an unnatural trend to where babies should get their milk from, which brainwashes a mother's instincts/bonds if this issue