Neil Padukone: Article Analysis

Decent Essays
Author Neil Padukone is chair on the Social and Urban Policy Interest Council at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Padukone has worked with the project on National Security Reform which is a group of people who first came together to go against the Soviet Union, but today they compat problems like terrorism and transnational crime. Therefore it is no surprise that Padukone talks about the good things to do with nuclear weapons rather than all the bad things. For instance the article talks about how every nuclear site around the world has an inspector and how even in Iran none of the inspectors have been kicked out. That means that they have up-to-code nuclear sites. Another topic discussed is how from the other countries perspective …show more content…
One thing this paper discusses is how war between states with nuclear weapons is discouraged because of the weapons. Atomic bombs are extremely difficult to manage and always have imperfections because they are manmade and humans are the ones controlling them so there is always a chance that something will go wrong. Since the United States was the first state to develop nuclear weapons they have it perfected the most, many other states have weapon designs that are much less safe. Not only are the weapons that other countries have less safe but the leadership that many other countries have is not at the same caliber as the United States which could lead to disaster. Iran was one of the countries to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and if they were to get an atomic bomb they would violate that treaty and invite other countries to violate that …show more content…
He has interviewed over a dozen world leaders and has seen many places around the world. Tepperman discusses how even a crazy dictator knows he cannot win a war against a nuclear state and therefore will not try to start a war with us. Many smaller countries will not spend the money and resources to create nuclear weapons because they are controversial and expensive. Larger countries such as Russia and China who already have nukes have shown little intention of giving them up. President Obama is trying to make the world nuclear weapon-free but it doesn’t seem like that is going to happen any time soon. Since those countries do not plan on giving up their nuclear weapons the United States is doing the right thing in helping countries such as Russia and Pakistan keep their nuclear weapons safe and out of enemy

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3- According to this article, there is a nuclear war predicted to happen in the near future between the U.S. and Russia. Each one of them has nuclear weapons and tries to build bigger bombs and more accurate missiles to ensure its security. In this article, Donella Meadows illustrates that there is another solution to ensure each country’s security; it is so simple that children can come up with. The solution is that both countries have to get rid of their nuclear weapons. In order to prove that, Meadows quoted two conversations from a journal called “Nuclear Concerns and Humankind”.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With numerous amounts of detail and foreign affairs in the article, Coll uses this as a means to show his knowledge on the topic while still persuading the modest tone. Coll’s details on Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other countries about nuclear affairs is meant to educate the reader by giving him the knowledgeable insight on the topic being discussed in places other than the United States. Coll says things like, “more dangerous competition is gaining momentum in the Middle East,” and “ it may be impossible to prevent nuclear gridlock in the Middle East.” These statements show the scale of nuclear affairs and maximizes the importance of the matter. By using international affairs and showing the danger and problems in other places of the across the world, Coll hopes to show that the danger occurring in other places could eventually be occurring here if nothing is done to solve it.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Peacekeeping

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although Canada is a non-nuclear weapons state country, it promotes disarmament and elimination of nuclear weapons and related materials. Canada’s firm stance against the use of nuclear weapons and its involvement in the official Treaty of Nonproliferation alleviated global fear, and consequently, Canada claimed its identity as a…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Atoms for Peace” In New York, on December 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower presents his speech, “Atoms for Peace,” to the members of the United Nations Assembly in hopes to persuade and inspire the audience of well established political leaders to involve themselves in world conflicts in pursuit of peaceful negotiations rather than actions of warfare. Eisenhower presents this speech with the initiative to perhaps bring about a change in the fashion of how the world approaches the general occurring conflict. In this speech, Eisenhower directs his attention to atomic weaponry, its advancements, and the damage it may reap on the world. Furthermore, to officially open the main points of discussion, Eisenhower begins to express his views on advancing atomic weaponry by saying to the audience, “This we shall do in the conviction that you will provide a great share of the wisdom, of the courage, and the faith which can bring to this world lasting peace for all nations, and happiness and well-being for all men.” Eisenhower begins the speech by first, addressing the audience and then describing to them the place and situation of which he was in at the time he had received…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The long-term dangers of radioactive fallout and environmental contamination potentially affect innocent people, allies, enemies, or even one’s own population. Hence, since the side effects of nuclear weapons can’t be measure or controlled, can’t be ever justifiable. The psychologist Eric Fromm supports part of this view by claiming that logic of the way that wars back in the day used to be, are not the same, nor hold for the same standards for modern nuclear wars. The pacifist position argues that the use of nuclear weapons will always be morally wrong because: “1) their use will result in widespread noncombatant deaths and 2) the destructive effects of such weapons will necessarily be out of proportion to any political or military objectives achieved” (p.208). Yet, there are some objections against the pacifist position.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that those who possess power can do as they choose is not new. This idea was proven true during the Cold War in the late 1950s and 1960s. In Pat Frank’s Alas, Babylon, the Soviet Union was in deadlock with the United States for world domination. One false step by the American Air Force had disastrous repercussions for the citizens of the United States.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iran Nuclear Program Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iran’s nuclear program was not always seen as a controversial aspect of Iran’s domestic policy. As a matter of fact, the origins of the Iranian program began in the 1950’s with the support of the United States. Research and development of a nuclear program began once Tehran joined Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace initiative and signed treaty No.4898. On December 8, 1953 during the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly the Atoms for Peace Program was launched by Eisenhower. International dynamics set by the Cold War provided an incentive for American scientists to “allow all peoples of all nations to see that…the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays