In respect to how the duties of the teachers are viewed, in reference to tort law, their responsibility is in no way “different than that which rests generally on every member in society” (Seitz, 1971, p. 551), which means that in general, teachers should be vigilante in doing everything possible in order to identify, anticipate, and attempt to remedy hazardous situations that could lead to injury. Further, teachers are not only required to consider student acts, such as choosing to sprint down a crowded hallway, which could lead to a hard fall and a broken bone, teachers need to also be considering their own actions, such as driving too fast through a parking lot, or choosing to step outside their classroom to make a phone call. Since “courts recognize that pupils falls within the category of ‘neighbors’, teachers and administrators must have them in contemplation when they act or omit to act” (Seitz, 1971,
In respect to how the duties of the teachers are viewed, in reference to tort law, their responsibility is in no way “different than that which rests generally on every member in society” (Seitz, 1971, p. 551), which means that in general, teachers should be vigilante in doing everything possible in order to identify, anticipate, and attempt to remedy hazardous situations that could lead to injury. Further, teachers are not only required to consider student acts, such as choosing to sprint down a crowded hallway, which could lead to a hard fall and a broken bone, teachers need to also be considering their own actions, such as driving too fast through a parking lot, or choosing to step outside their classroom to make a phone call. Since “courts recognize that pupils falls within the category of ‘neighbors’, teachers and administrators must have them in contemplation when they act or omit to act” (Seitz, 1971,