In that way, they argue that the era should instead be the Negligent Era. Specifically, these critics cite negligence towards minorities. According to them, women, blacks, and more were all neglected by progressive reformers, thus proving that progressives did not truly have good intentions. And while it is doubtless that Progressive reform occasionally hurt minorities, it is important to distinguish between intentional negligence and unintentional ignorance, especially in a time period defined by intentions. When examples of “negligence” are examined more closely, each has the Progressive intent at its core. For example, segregation was actually the result of good intentions and ignorance. Progressives used segregation not to ignore racial issues, but rather to protect minorities. As McGerr writes, “segregation actually drew on basic progressive values and aims. [...] Progressives turned to segregation as a way to preserve weaker groups, such as African-Americans and Native Americans, facing brutality and even annihilation”. Segregation literally purged white society of the offending blacks. It would give whites their “pure” society and give blacks a safer one. In reality, whites felt the government had not punished blacks enough, and blacks thought the government had not protected them enough. As a result, tensions only increased. Regardless, segregation was Progressive because it was meant to protect blacks, even if it ultimately was ignorant of issue’s
In that way, they argue that the era should instead be the Negligent Era. Specifically, these critics cite negligence towards minorities. According to them, women, blacks, and more were all neglected by progressive reformers, thus proving that progressives did not truly have good intentions. And while it is doubtless that Progressive reform occasionally hurt minorities, it is important to distinguish between intentional negligence and unintentional ignorance, especially in a time period defined by intentions. When examples of “negligence” are examined more closely, each has the Progressive intent at its core. For example, segregation was actually the result of good intentions and ignorance. Progressives used segregation not to ignore racial issues, but rather to protect minorities. As McGerr writes, “segregation actually drew on basic progressive values and aims. [...] Progressives turned to segregation as a way to preserve weaker groups, such as African-Americans and Native Americans, facing brutality and even annihilation”. Segregation literally purged white society of the offending blacks. It would give whites their “pure” society and give blacks a safer one. In reality, whites felt the government had not punished blacks enough, and blacks thought the government had not protected them enough. As a result, tensions only increased. Regardless, segregation was Progressive because it was meant to protect blacks, even if it ultimately was ignorant of issue’s