Negligence Case

Improved Essays
Question 1
Negligence is a scenario where one fails to act with the level of care that a person of ordinary prudence would have acted in a similar situation. It can arise out of actions or omissions where some duty to act is owed. In a negligence claim, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed him a duty off care, the defendant breached that duty, and as a result, the plaintiff suffered a loss.
In this case, Maxrun failed to take reasonable care of Gunter’s hard disk. Maxrun owed Gunter a duty to keep track of the replaced hard disk and return the hard disk to Gunter. The standard of care required in this case is that of a reasonable person. The repair department was expected to take reasonable care to ensure that the right hard disk was returned to Gunter. The requirements for the standard of care are dependent on the circumstance, but in THEL HAFT v LONE PINE HOTEL, it was decided that statutes can be used to establish a standard of care.
Gunter was the foreseeable plaintiff as he was likely to be affected by the fault of the Maxrun. Maxrun owes a duty to Gunter as it would foresee that he would suffer a loss as a result of the misplaced hard disk. Because Maxrun
…show more content…
Contributory negligence is a defense that applies when the plaintiff contributed to the harm or loss. The presumption is that the plaintiff has a duty to act in a reasonable manner and if he fails to act in this manner, he may be held liable for the damage or loss that occurs even if another person was responsible. In comparative negligence, the negligence of each party is weighed when determining the damages. This approach is a way to reduce the unfair results of the contributory negligence approach. In this case, Maxrun PC can argue that Gunter was partially to blame for the loss of data because he did not back up the data on the hard

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cause Of Negligence

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is careless and unresponsible behaviour. It arise when one person (defendant) could avoid some damages or financial loss, but did not suceed at foreseeing it while acting. As a result, another person was caused and affected by some sort of damage. However, that damage was not made intentionally, but still it was caused by the defendant, as he or she could prevent the damage made to another person by taking reasonable care. Sometimes such an unpleasant situation may be solved by a simple «sorry», althought a victim of the negligent behaviour may also sue a careless person and will make a defendant pay an injury costs.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Torrt And Wrongful Omission

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages

    To succeed in an action of tort, the plaintiff has to prove that he has been caused legal damage. To simplify, it is to be proved that there was a wrongful act or omission of an act which violated the legal right vested in the plaintiff. No action under law of tort can be taken unless there is a violation of legal right. If there has been a violation of legal right, the same is actionable in the court of law, irrespective of the fact that the plaintiff has suffered any loss or not. This has been expressed by the maxim “Injuria sine damno” and “Damnum sine injuria”.…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Cardoza

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The person who did the wrongdoing should be liable for the proximate results of his actions. To put it more simply, Andrews felt that negligence was a relative concept. Generally, he was of the belief that everyone had the duty to not commit acts that may result in harming others. To summarize, both Cardozo and Andrews examined the duty of care in reference to negligence. To Cardozo, in order for there to be a duty to care, there had to be connection between the Defendant, the Railroad Company, and the harm that was caused to the plaintiff, Palsgraf.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    O’Neal’s legal action against the Colton School, suing on the grounds that he is discharged from his duties because his performance became impracticable, is objectively implausible. His condition was not sudden. He could have chosen not to agree to another term of his employment contract if he found his vision too burdensome. Although O’Neal’s legal action will be unsuccessful, if the Colton School were to counter sue for a material breach, seeking damages for the expenses incurred from his breach mid academic year or contractual term, O’Neal would find himself liable for those…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Can plaintiff recover compensation for injuries sustained by using a product, even though he did not purchase the product and did not prove negligence on the part of the manufacturer? Both the plaintiff and defendants appealed the jury decision. The plaintiff demanded a reversed judgment that in the favor of the retailer. However, according to product liability and strict liability, the manufacturer should be liable for their harmful or defective products. The manufacturer should be liable for the negligence if their product to cause harm to the users.…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff shall claim that the actions of defendants’ were intentional which caused harm by personal injury, that resulted in loss of financial stability and career sustainability, which was not insignificant and fell under the scope of defendants’ liability. The ‘but for’ test also establishes that had the defendants acted with care, the plaintiff would have been able to continue normally. Furthermore, the ‘egg- shell skull’ is applicable, which states that the defendant must take the plaintiff as they found them. Defense: A defense of voluntary assumption of risk can be brought by defendants, which is an inherent risk , especially in recreational activates, consenting to injuries. However the League deemed the defendant’s actions unreasonable and they pleaded guilty to the charges, which weakens their…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence: Case Study

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The main test for establishing factual causation in an action for negligence- but for the defendant`s breach of duty the damage would not have occurred”. a. OSCOLA for footnote: Chris Turner `Unlocking Torts` (4th edn, Taylor &Francis 2014) 80 b. OSCOLA for bibliography: Turner C, Unlocking Torts 4th edn. (Taylor &Francis) 2014 2. “Causation is established by proving that the defendant`s breach of duty was, as a matter of fact, a cause of the damage. To decide this issue the first question to be asked is whether the damage would have occurred but for the breach of duty.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    B. Day arguably caused harm to Smith intentionally by failing to take effective actions In an analysis of intent, it is "the landlord's conduct, and not his intentions", that is controlling. Blackett v. Olanoff, 4358 N.E.2d 817, 818 (1977). Rather than looking for subjective intent, the court determines whether the act "is the natural and probable consequence of what the landlord did, failed to do, or permitted to be done. Doe, 630 N.E.2d at 255.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just like the example I previously mentioned with LimeWire; people were given a just law and they abused their rights. Once someone gets a taste of plagiarism or illegal borrowing, it can quickly and disturbingly become a terrible habit. Yes, the destruction of the plagiarizers academic and professional reputation might be enough of a consequence, but that is only dealing with the plagiarizer. What about the victim who was robbed of their ideas? I truly believe that the victim will not be satisfied with having the reputation of the plagiarizer be destroyed; I believe that they will want some compensation in return.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hedley Byrne V Hellers

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The law has progressed throughout the years regarding liability for harm caused by negligent misstatements. Negligent misstatements occur when a pursuer relies upon a statement given by the defendant which, in turn, causes loss to the pursuer. Until the case of Hedley Byrne v Heller, the courts did not usually impose liability regarding negligent misstatements on the grounds of policy. Before the case of Hedley Byrne v Heller, the idea that one party owed another a duty of care regarding misstatements was rejected. The only way to claim for loss was through contract law.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics