What the case is about
The case was a podiatrist Doctor and his patient. He was sued for a malpractice or negligence, and misdiagnosis, the patient claims due to his misdiagnoses and negligence cost the patient permanent disability and needed for further treatment and surgeries. The Doctor denied the negligence claim and said it was caused by someone who the doctor said he had no control over. When he was asked in response to the interrogatories about the identity of those he calls others. According to the complaint, " Dr. Gale answered, he acted "under the direction and control of his employer, Dr. Aaron Olson. In response to the doctor claims the plaintiff, “According to the complaint “The patient served an amended complaint adding Dr. Olson
The case was a podiatrist Doctor and his patient. He was sued for a malpractice or negligence, and misdiagnosis, the patient claims due to his misdiagnoses and negligence cost the patient permanent disability and needed for further treatment and surgeries. The Doctor denied the negligence claim and said it was caused by someone who the doctor said he had no control over. When he was asked in response to the interrogatories about the identity of those he calls others. According to the complaint, " Dr. Gale answered, he acted "under the direction and control of his employer, Dr. Aaron Olson. In response to the doctor claims the plaintiff, “According to the complaint “The patient served an amended complaint adding Dr. Olson