Cause Of Negligence

Improved Essays
Negligence is careless and unresponsible behaviour. It arise when one person (defendant) could avoid some damages or financial loss, but did not suceed at foreseeing it while acting. As a result, another person was caused and affected by some sort of damage. However, that damage was not made intentionally, but still it was caused by the defendant, as he or she could prevent the damage made to another person by taking reasonable care. Sometimes such an unpleasant situation may be solved by a simple «sorry», althought a victim of the negligent behaviour may also sue a careless person and will make a defendant pay an injury costs. So if the case with the negligence goes further to the court and claimant wants to sue defendant, it will be neccessary …show more content…
A mother can be not attentive enough and her baby can fall form the swing. Grandmother might forget to tell everyone that the floor is slippery after mopping it so somebody can fall down. And of course, nobody will sue mother or grandmother. But the most dangerous acts of negligence with the most hard consequences is the professional negligence. Whatever is the job, if there is communication with customers, there is always a chance to be claimed for professional negligence. A lawyer which did not hear about the updates in the legislation of the United Kingdom, will advice a customer to sign an important contract and accept all conditions, when it became illegal after the updates. That may cause an impressive economic loss. It is not the duty of care of the lawyer to prevent economic loss of the customer’s company, however it is lawyer’s duty to keep his knowledge up-to-date to prevent any illegal action made by a customer. So in the case if the financial loss was caused by the unresponsible lawyer, which breached his duty of care by not reading the new updates in the legislation of the United Kingdom and then giving an advice, based on out of date knowledge, a customer can claim that a lawyer owed him a duty of care and the level of the damage will be defined on order to pay for the financial loss caused by the negligent actions of the …show more content…
All three steps mentioned before should be completed. First of all it is necessary to prove that the surveyor owed a duty of care. It is important to look at surveyor’s contract, agreement and work updates in order to see what does his duty require to do. It might be a surveyor’s fault if a valuation of the property was made inappropriately; the defects of the property were not identified, there was not further actions made and nobody was informed after pointing out the problem etc. The breach of duty of care can vary, however it is almost always leading to a financial loss. Such a mistakes are very expensive to resolve, that is why there are a lot of issues in the court when the surveyors are being claimed. Finally, the last step is to prove that the breach of the duty has caused some sort of damage, e.g. financial loss to see if there is anything that can be recovered to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dishonesty Research Paper

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One may argue that dishonesty is the better option, as long as the victim of the lie does not find out. However, this can lead to other detrimental consequences. This can include the guilt that one feels after lying to someone that one cares about. It can additionally cause the two of these people involved to not have the same understanding of the situation, which can cause further problems. Although dishonesty may seem appealing because of its avoidance of immediate negative results, it creates more drastic problems for the liar and the victim of the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In arbitration, the business is allowed to keep its affairs private, so any unlawful or harmful business practices would not be brought to public light if taken through arbitration, and the business would not be forced to alter anything. If it’s in the case of financial compensation for a slight, to expose a corrupt business practice, then litigation is more qualified than arbitration, which is often why, in the past, contracts had that option blocked by mandatory arbitration clauses in order to keep employees from exposing those business practices, as far as I understand…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The reason is that the employer maybe fails to fulfill some of the terms in the contract. This may delay the contractor working process. Variation is one of the reasons to cause delay. In common law, it mention that contractor have the liability to provide evidence to claim money. First of all, it has to prove that the work is extra and have not been included in the contract.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mike Lynn: Whistleblower

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mike Lynn was a professional and as a professional it is sometimes your duty to speak out for the right moral reasons. He decided to be a whistleblower because he thought the information that he is hiding needs to be told to other people. He may have cost his company a lot of money or even have exposed them to legal matters but in the end he did the most responsible thing a man could’ve done in his position. It’s wrong for a company to hide its flaws. Even though a lawsuit was filed against him, he didn’t regret the decision of being a whistleblower.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hedley Byrne V Hellers

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Because of this, the expected beneficiaries did not inherit the money from the testator when he passed. The intended beneficiaries proceeded to sue the solicitors and it was held that a duty of care was in fact owed. Lord Goff overcame difficulties previously in place that stated a solicitor only has a duty of care to his client, that one cannot usually recover in the law of delict for pure economic loss and lastly, if a claim could be made in the instant case, many claims against solicitors could come forward. However, it was decided that solicitors had to be liable in this case in order for justice to the beneficiaries. The law was therefore required to expand in terms of negligent claims.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The manufacturer should be liable for the negligence if their product to cause harm to the users. In such a type of case, it is not necessary for the customers to give notice within a reasonable time to the sellers. While the purpose of the 1769 section of the Civil Code is to protect the seller, and product liability protects the customers’ rights regarding defective products. Another issue arose from this case was whether to emphasize on the Civil Code (section 1769) or product liability when viewing this case. While both parties had their own reasons to defense themselves, it is hard to make a…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, the lawyer or mediator may fail to advice for it because it entails accepting liability for the wrong done. For this reason, lawyers would find it difficult to route for the same because of the conditions and the repercussions that come with…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is argued by many that current tort laws are unfair and that very high, even unfair, amounts of compensation are being paid out as a result of theses cases. This has brought of the discussion of Tort Reform. In essence, Tort Reform is looking to limit the number of cases by limiting the types of cases that can be filed, when…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Contributory negligence is a defense that applies when the plaintiff contributed to the harm or loss. The presumption is that the plaintiff has a duty to act in a reasonable manner and if he fails to act in this manner, he may be held liable for the damage or loss that occurs even if another person was responsible. In comparative negligence, the negligence of each party is weighed when determining the damages. This approach is a way to reduce the unfair results of the contributory negligence approach. In this case, Maxrun PC can argue that Gunter was partially to blame for the loss of data because he did not back up the data on the hard…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liquidated Damages Essay

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Section 74 read with Section 73 and, therefore, in each case of default, and the aggrieved person to prove that he suffered before he can apply for a decree does not require a breach of contract, the actual loss or damage. Under the circumstances the Court has the ability, even without proof of actual loss suffered the consequences of breach of a violation of a reasonable award of compensation. • In some contracts, it would be impossible to court, in order to assess the breach, if we consider the compensation will not be punished or unreasonable manner, the court may grant the same, if it is a genuine pre-estimate of the parties arising compensation As a reasonable compensation…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics