Digital Vs Digital Photography Research Paper

Americans took an average of 105 billion photos in 2015 alone. A high percent of them most likely are digital cameras considering all the smartphones and new technology out today. The smaller percent would be taken by film, but this doesn 't always mean digital is better, this is usually because film is used more for art and takes more precise time. There are different parts to these two cameras making it hard to debate which one is actually “better.” There is the ways they each work, the technology and editing that gets put into the photos, and the relevance of each camera. There is also the cost of each one, depending on how much someone would be willing to spend. When buying either camera you have to think about which one is cheaper right …show more content…
The problem with the outcome of analog photography is that the images deteriorate over time. Dyes in the ink fade and discolor and the paper often yellows or becomes brittle, this is what makes photographs before digital look so antique. They also degrade from air, light, temperature, and humidity. There are certain programs to save photos according to what you would like to do with them. There are digitizing services that make it possible to send your photos in and have edits don’t. Prints will usually cost 20 to 35 cents each while slides or negatives are usually 20 to 50 cents each. It is also possible to scan the photos from a person 's home although this can be rather costly if the needed supplies are not already available. When choosing a home photo-digitizing service it is important to pay attention to resolution and the scanning process. It is generally better to use 600 dots for digital and 3000 dpi for slides and negatives to be able to edit your image correctly. A flatbed home scanner is better to use but costs $230. It is important to remember that a scanner with a second light source in the lid is needed. It is also possible to rent a scanner for a cheaper outcome. After the photos are scanned they need to be put into files and named and the digital ones need to be backed up. A man named Curtis Bise digitized his photos and was able to do the …show more content…
Film is still sold and highly bought in almost any store involved with cameras and photos. Upfront film is still cheap, dependable and tactile. This is why it is agreed that prints and traditional snapshots will be around for much longer. Although it is highly likely that film will definitely become more obsolete it is not seemed to be for a long time. Digital photography still continues to grow faster than film although film markets also continue to grow and be successful. Kodak believes there is still plenty of money to make in film. They have brought out two new 100-speed films. They are also bringing out new films for the portrait market which they see growing. Film outputs are still used extensively for “color management backup.” This is used to back up digital files through chromes. It is said in professional digital or film markets from 1999 that “digital=ordinary” and “film= exception.” Those prove to still be the most common truths in photography. “Traditional” is an image that is created on film or chrome and delivered that way. “Digital” is delivered in a digital file, or digital print, or both, “A lot of traditional printing has simply been tossed away” agrees Joseph Gerardi from Digital photo editing. Digital has more control while dark rooms have more