The lack of action and the incompetence of the HEW was the main reason Title IX was stalled in its start. Inspired by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title IX declared that women were not allowed to be denied on the basis of gender of educational programs by government funded institutions but took years for the same women who actively fought to pass the Title to see it in action. With disgraceful lack of enforcement of both the Department of Health, Education and Welfare and the narrow definition that emphasized “federal funding”; the document allowed room for those who wanted to discriminate based on gender.
In 1972, Title IX passed after two rigorous attempts women celebrated at the opportunities that were newly presented to them but soon …show more content…
Failure to present opportunities for women to participate in sports was very detrimental to Title IX in a system openly discriminated women from sports and education opportunities. The dropping of the term action eliminated a faster process to assimilate women into the women into the system and instead left open a window for an educational programs and sports team to their own devices; many who were against funding women in the first place. In conclusion, the decision canceling out the idea of “affirmative action” in the final stages was one of it’s major downfalls () and one of it’s worst enemies was the way it was …show more content…
Bell for failing to sign to a Compliance Form that would result in enacting Title IX. In result, the US government denied financial aid and resulted in a case brought against them by the community college and four students“()”. The courts decided that Title IX was only for educational hubs like universities that received funding and private programs and schools did do not have to comply with the discrimination law when dealing with athletic programs which opened the doorway to gender discrimination. Justice White slowed Title IX when ruled that Title IX was only worthy for “public funding” ; this allowed institutions to realize that they can easily evade being covered by the governing Title IX. In order not to comply with Title IX, many institutions and universities found a way through the loophole in the 70s by emphasizing their lack in participating in federally funded programs such as Pell Grant and the BEOG Waiver Fee. Although a few students received Federal Student Funding who attended Grove City College , the federal funding was not channeled directly through the school disqualifying the schools necessity to abide by the law. In the case ruling, the court was ten decided in court that programs who receive federally funded money were in trouble of complying the law, not the institutions.
In 1972, Title IX passed after two rigorous attempts women celebrated at the opportunities that were newly presented to them but soon …show more content…
Failure to present opportunities for women to participate in sports was very detrimental to Title IX in a system openly discriminated women from sports and education opportunities. The dropping of the term action eliminated a faster process to assimilate women into the women into the system and instead left open a window for an educational programs and sports team to their own devices; many who were against funding women in the first place. In conclusion, the decision canceling out the idea of “affirmative action” in the final stages was one of it’s major downfalls () and one of it’s worst enemies was the way it was …show more content…
Bell for failing to sign to a Compliance Form that would result in enacting Title IX. In result, the US government denied financial aid and resulted in a case brought against them by the community college and four students“()”. The courts decided that Title IX was only for educational hubs like universities that received funding and private programs and schools did do not have to comply with the discrimination law when dealing with athletic programs which opened the doorway to gender discrimination. Justice White slowed Title IX when ruled that Title IX was only worthy for “public funding” ; this allowed institutions to realize that they can easily evade being covered by the governing Title IX. In order not to comply with Title IX, many institutions and universities found a way through the loophole in the 70s by emphasizing their lack in participating in federally funded programs such as Pell Grant and the BEOG Waiver Fee. Although a few students received Federal Student Funding who attended Grove City College , the federal funding was not channeled directly through the school disqualifying the schools necessity to abide by the law. In the case ruling, the court was ten decided in court that programs who receive federally funded money were in trouble of complying the law, not the institutions.