I would say a peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. I say this because if you're being peaceful what is there to be negative about? There would be no reason for a negative impact on society if it is a peaceful resistance to laws. For example in the Muhammad Ali's Anti-War Stand Was Civil Disobedience, Not Draft Dodging article Ali is nonaggressive and is peaceful about the situation, doesn't have an uproar. Although people disagree about the situation there was nothing negative about the situation. This is the understanding that it is wrong to initiate violence: to use force against those who have not used force against you. Another example of positively peaceful resistance is Rosa Parks. At the time segregation was
…show more content…
The others agreed to give their seats up but Rosa, she would not give her seat up just because of her color but she also would not give her seat up because she was tired of her job. There was not a negative impact on society, I would say with the new laws they started making it made us better to become as one. To not see each other as color but just see people the way you are, your skin color doesn't matter. Continuing, peaceful disobedience is a part of our constitutional right, us as citizens have the civil right to protest when we want to change in our society or government. However, us as a group of people, not individuals, can accomplish this as we have the strength in numbers. Protesting might be viewed in a negative light due to recent social and economical issues involving minority communities, and those who take it in a more aggressive and barbaric manner which leads to rioting. People seem to confuse these two, hence the negativity from the community on change, and the government's non-involvement. Regardless of legal consequences, your protest shouldn't be violent, demanding, or putting others down as that causes more chaos in our society, as that separates us …show more content…
We learn new things every day about our communities, and non-outrageous changes or assistance from the government should be given if the people want it. Another example for peaceful resistance is Martin Luther King Jr. marches, he gave speeches and went on march's protesting for equal
The others agreed to give their seats up but Rosa, she would not give her seat up just because of her color but she also would not give her seat up because she was tired of her job. There was not a negative impact on society, I would say with the new laws they started making it made us better to become as one. To not see each other as color but just see people the way you are, your skin color doesn't matter. Continuing, peaceful disobedience is a part of our constitutional right, us as citizens have the civil right to protest when we want to change in our society or government. However, us as a group of people, not individuals, can accomplish this as we have the strength in numbers. Protesting might be viewed in a negative light due to recent social and economical issues involving minority communities, and those who take it in a more aggressive and barbaric manner which leads to rioting. People seem to confuse these two, hence the negativity from the community on change, and the government's non-involvement. Regardless of legal consequences, your protest shouldn't be violent, demanding, or putting others down as that causes more chaos in our society, as that separates us …show more content…
We learn new things every day about our communities, and non-outrageous changes or assistance from the government should be given if the people want it. Another example for peaceful resistance is Martin Luther King Jr. marches, he gave speeches and went on march's protesting for equal