I. Introduction:
In this paper we are going to be talking about the differences in Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six- day creation. We will be comparing the old earth and the young earth viewpoints on the topic of Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six-day creation. The purpose of doing this is to see how much our earth has changed and if we can understand what has happened has happened. We are going to look in to why and how they are different or not. As well as explain each creation of the earth in Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six-day creation in the old-Earth and the Young-Earth.
II. Old Earth secular view:
When looking at the Old-Earths secular viewpoint for this essay it is Nebular Hypothesis. During the find and research of this viewpoint of Nebular Hypothesis we find that there is a cloud of gas and that dust collapsed and gravity begins to spin faster and faster. This is due to the angular momentum conservation (Origin of the Solar system, n.d.). Therefore, this cloud (nebular hypothesis) says the earth, plants, moon and the sun were formed. “The truth is that we don’t understand star formation at a fundamental level” (M. Chown, Feb. 1998). It has been said that the time of this all happening would have taken at least 100 million years ago. So due to the time that …show more content…
Old earth try’s explaining that the days are too long and in a geological time period more like the big bang theory. Then Young earth is the biblical view of how God is our creator. To me the comparison is nature vs. nurture. "Christians believe God has two books through which He reveals himself," generally to everyone in the book of nature, and specifically to Christians in the book of Scripture. Both are God's word, and both proclaim the same truth, so reconciling them should not be a problem” (Jay Richards, 2015). They also started in two different time periods as
In this paper we are going to be talking about the differences in Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six- day creation. We will be comparing the old earth and the young earth viewpoints on the topic of Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six-day creation. The purpose of doing this is to see how much our earth has changed and if we can understand what has happened has happened. We are going to look in to why and how they are different or not. As well as explain each creation of the earth in Nebular Hypothesis vs. Six-day creation in the old-Earth and the Young-Earth.
II. Old Earth secular view:
When looking at the Old-Earths secular viewpoint for this essay it is Nebular Hypothesis. During the find and research of this viewpoint of Nebular Hypothesis we find that there is a cloud of gas and that dust collapsed and gravity begins to spin faster and faster. This is due to the angular momentum conservation (Origin of the Solar system, n.d.). Therefore, this cloud (nebular hypothesis) says the earth, plants, moon and the sun were formed. “The truth is that we don’t understand star formation at a fundamental level” (M. Chown, Feb. 1998). It has been said that the time of this all happening would have taken at least 100 million years ago. So due to the time that …show more content…
Old earth try’s explaining that the days are too long and in a geological time period more like the big bang theory. Then Young earth is the biblical view of how God is our creator. To me the comparison is nature vs. nurture. "Christians believe God has two books through which He reveals himself," generally to everyone in the book of nature, and specifically to Christians in the book of Scripture. Both are God's word, and both proclaim the same truth, so reconciling them should not be a problem” (Jay Richards, 2015). They also started in two different time periods as