Belief In Knowledge

Improved Essays
Audrey Eddy
Doctor James Eiswert
Philosophy
1 November 2016
The Nature of Belief in Knowledge Without beliefs there would be no knowledge. In order to achieve knowledge one must understand how to reach to it. There are many complex steps for one to succeed knowledge. Plato states that in order to reach knowledge one must have a true justified belief. There are two types of beliefs: knowledge and opinions. One may have the opinion based belief that the sky is green. Another person may have the knowledgeable belief that the sky is blue. These are two different types of beliefs, but one is only considered justifiable as true, which is the knowledgeable belief. In order to better understand the process in order to get from beliefs to
…show more content…
A belief is described as a speech communication act that contains two essential features. A belief must contain linguistic expressions which are sentential, which translates over to sentences. These sentences must be grammatically correct units within a given language that states something to be the case. An example of the belief speech act would be: “I believe that the grass is green”. After a person states their belief the responding person could say one of three possible things. One possible thing that they could say is: Yes, I too believe that the grass is green. Another thing that the person could say is: No, I do not agree that the grass is green. Lastly, another option that the person could say is: I cannot decide if the grass is green or not. Speech acts are sentences which comes with an affirmation, denial, or withholding. If it does not have one of these three things it cannot be a belief speech act, it then becomes a non-belief speech act. A non-belief speech act is still considered a part of language. It has a developed syntax and proper grammar. Non-belief speech acts has a particular meaning but does not hold a belief. Non-belief speech acts are not able to be well formed sentences. Some examples of this would be: wow, cool, thanks, etc. These examples are known as standalones. Standalones are words that have meaning but are not considered to be sentences, therefore, not …show more content…
One must begin at belief then continue down to communication acts, then to speech acts, to beliefs then to propositions, then finally to knowledge. As discussed before, Plato states that knowledge has to be a justified true belief. One thing that Plato studied within philosophy was epistemology. Epistemology is the study or theory of or word about knowledge. Beliefs contain knowledge and opinions. These are two very different things. Knowledge contains beliefs that are known. Opinions contains beliefs which are not known. Although opinions may not be known at the moment there is a possible chance that they can transfer over into the knowledge side of the spectrum. All that has to be done in order for this to happen be to meet justification and truth within the statement being made. Within making the path to knowledge one must understand that what is being said cannot be a disposition, non-speech act, non-belief act, non-propositional act, or an opinion. This is because these certain things do not meet the criteria in order to be classified as a knowledgeable fact. Epistemology takes on an important role within today’s modern society, thanks to Plato. Knowledge can be confusing at times, but over time it makes more sense throughout communicating within a community where there is plenty of knowledge to be shared with one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle once said “Each man judges well the things that he knows, and of these he is the best judge. Thus the man who had been educated in a certain area is the best judge in that area, while the man who has a general education is a good judge in general.” The quote states how an individual is able to effectively judge the things that they know the best. Someone who has been educated in a certain area is the best judge for that area. The nature of the quote is taking what you know to make a choice and come up with your own conclusions and opinions.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An opinion, something to discuss, to share, to believe in. Everyone has an opinion on something, ranging from who’s the best football team to which candidate has better political policies. Sometimes people or even a society may have so much faith in their opinion that they believe their opinions are facts. Nevertheless, where do opinions come from? Backgrounds, religion, and culture are all important factors on how opinions are molded.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Plato and Cornel West demonstrate important ways of teaching a student how to think in a similar way. One way being how being wrong can be beneficial throughout their stories the “Apology” and “On My Intellectual Vacation.” In Cornel West “On My Intellectual Vacation” When he notions towards being wrong is beneficial on page 24 “In other words it is not a matter of pointing fingers or calling name, but really showing that you are in the very mess that you are trying to grasp. Moreover this tends to open people up a little bit.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ones beliefs involve in what their past experiences and their knowledge of what they think is true, what they think is factual. So, the individuals original belief is that the shirt is purple is by facts that they believe is true. By someone offering money to change the persons “belief” does not work as they fake the belief of the new colour shirt to get a benefit out of it. So, their original belief is still in their mind at the time. This helps prove that the facts individuals are familiar with help them in their decision whether they believe in God existence or not.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Five Dialogues & Symposium: Socrates’ Search for Knowledge In Five Dialogues and Symposium by Plato, Socrates the Ancient Greek philosopher challenges his fellow men about the notion that they do not posses knowledge. The role of a philosopher is to reflect on life and ask existential questions because curiosity is innate in all humans. In Apology, Socrates expresses to the jury and judges at his trial, “they have been proved to lay claim to knowledge when they know nothing” (Apology, 23d). Though humans claim to have knowledge, Socrates believes human wisdom is worthless because it is unattainable.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Modern society, teachers contribute to the education system by shaping students into responsible individuals and preparing them for society’s obstacles. Yet, there are various ways in which education is implemented, and to Plato and Freire, their views on education differ greatly. Freire suggests that students should not be empty ‘banks’ that are ‘filled’ with deposits of information by their teachers. Instead, teachers and students should engage in discussion and reflection so that critical thinking is encouraged. For Plato, education helps guide men out of the ‘cave’ of ignorance and into the ‘light’ of knowledge and reality.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meno Vs Socrates

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy: The Pursuit of Truth, in the Company of Nous Socrates, as presented in many works of Plato, makes inquiries about the garnering of knowledge and truth. In the platonic dialogue, Meno, Socrates attempts to answer Meno’s paradox: if you don’t know what you are looking for, how can it be found? Meno’s question allows for the assertion that inquiry is impossible, for how do we know what to ask, if we don’t know, or have knowledge about, what we are asking. This perplexity brings up the illusion of the enigmatic source of this knowledge. Where does knowledge originate from, what allows for the commencement of inquiry?…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Doctrine of Recollection is a theory of “learning” which aims to solve the issue of how one may learn something when one does not know what the thing is. Despite successfully and adequately addressing the paradox proposed by Meno, the Doctrine of Recollection fails to adequately address issues of its own circularity (as proposed by Edward Fraser) and also fails to address the issue of the regress problem. Perhaps one of the clearest instances where we learn of the Doctrine of Recollection occurs in Plato’s Meno. Meno, the interlocutor opposite Socrates, asks Socrates the question: “…how are you going to inquire about it, Socrates, when you do not at all know what it is?”…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates has a dialog with one of Plato’s student, Theaetetus, in this dialog they discuss what knowledge is. One of Theaetetus’ definition is that knowledge is true judgement, in this definition they go through several accounts in which knowledge cannot be true judgement. In the final refutation, Socrates offers a counter example in which he states “a skilled lawyer can bring jurymen into a state of true belief without bringing them into a state of knowledge” (Theaetetus 200d-201c). This alludes that true belief and knowledge are different states. A person can have true belief without knowledge of or about the item in which they have true belief.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to gain a better understanding of how truth is discovered rather than manufactured, one must examine the philosophy of Plato. A quintessential concept in Plato’s philosophy is the idea of being versus Being. In Plato’s Republic, the philosopher claims that there are two different realms within reality: the visible world of being, and the intelligible world of Being. In the world of Being, there exists what Plato calls the Forms. The Forms are Plato’s First Principle; he claims that the Forms are perfect, eternal, and non-changing objects in the intelligible realm, and these are the essences of the physical world; these are how things ought to be (INCLUDE CITATIONS).…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are 3 different types of knowledge: acquaintance knowledge (I know Auckland well), skillful knowledge (I know how to ride a bike), and propositional knowledge (I know that snakes are reptiles). The first two forms of knowledge are interesting, but we are only concerned with the third, what it is to know some proposition, ‘p’. We automatically note a difference between belief and knowledge. Individuals can believe propositions that are not true; but if you know that ‘p’, then ‘p’ must be true. You cannot know something incorrect; if it is incorrect, then you do not know it.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates claims that true opinion becomes knowledge when one provides a reason for why the opinion is true. In other words, true opinion becomes knowledge when one justifies it. Through several thought experiments I will attempt to show that Socrates is right in declaring that knowledge is more valuable than true opinion. I will start with the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I Believe In Acceptance

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I believe in acceptance. When we were first given this assignment, my anxiety set in immediately, I was nauseous and dizzy just thinking about getting in front of a class and stating what I believe. And in those first moments of realizing how scared I am of getting in front of the class and talking, I realized I am afraid to proclaim my beliefs because I am only seventeen. What I mean is, I don’t hold the key to knowledge and I don’t know what I believe, so how am I supposed to make you see what I believe as something that’s not, well, laughable. But this made me realize that I believe in…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s Allegory of the cave accounts for his theory of knowledge by showing how leaving ignorance turns perception into true belief. Plato’s theory of knowledge explains that perceptions of things are like the shadows on the cave wall and while the prisoners know a name for the thing, what they see is not true belief. The prisoners however know the names of the perceived things and while their reality is a façade, their soul knows of forms. I will explain how the darkness is ignorance, shadows are perception in the material world, how the prisoners had knowledge to begin with, and how they account for Plato’s epistemology.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to determine whether philosophies such as Idealism, Realism, and Pragmatism should reason with children. However, before we begin to analyze this statement, I think it is important to define what is reason and provide a brief overview of Piaget’s cognitive theory. Reasoning is a systematic process that enable individuals to achieve knowledge and understanding (Landauer & Rowlands, 2001). This process includes stages such as logic, deduction, and induction (Cohen, 1999).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays