Nature Vs Nurture Research Paper

In this critical essay I will be discussing the historic and comtemporary nature versus nurture (nativist vs empiricist) debate that has been shaped as discussion on human nature for centuries, even now. In many researchers, scientists and experimenters have argued that it is the crucial role of environment and on the other hand philosophers have argued that it is the biological beginnings, now each side of these have good arguments that makes it hard to decide whether a person’s development is because their DNA, or it is manipulated by their life experiences and their environment. Nevertheless, we now know that Nature and Nurture play a big role in human development, but not sure whether it is developed because of nature or due to nurture. Thinking about the two lines, “being yourself”, or “being who you are”, sound the same, but do they actually mean the same? …show more content…
These kinds of questions are what lead people to the great debate of nature vs. nurture. Now in your understanding if you deliberate that you were with personality already, then you take the side of nature, and if you deliberate that your personality developed based on the influences of childhood then you believe in nurture. It is believed that these two different theories make us who we are. Despite this the debate continues to be evident in many aspects of the psychological literature. Some have argued that this debate serves as a distraction (Spencer et al., 2009), others argue it offers a rich source of insight (Spelke & Kinzler, 2009), whereas others have proposed “alternatives” (Karmiloff-Smith,