Nature Vs Nurture Lord Of The Flies

Improved Essays
Nature Vs. Nurture

Growing up as a child I was always taught that pointing at people was disrespectful, same with talking while other people were talking. Or to always leave a place better than the way you found it. Our brains constantly search for knowledge, when we are young our parents install things into our brains that help us become good people, they essentially nurture us to be acceptable people. Not because our nature is deficient, but because nurture amplifies our natural qualities. Nature vs. Nurture is a topic talked about for centuries, largely spoken about in Goldings book “Lord of the Flies” and since argued because of all the good points from both parties. Ultimately, nurture outways nature, because we are looked at and judged by how we act, not where we come from.

John Locke, an English philosopher, stated that all humans are inherently good. While that sounds outrageous, it's a respectable theory. Humans are who they are made to be, or who
…show more content…
The boys were faced with adversity, and the pressure to hold everything together. They were put under extreme amounts of stress and in the hardest of situations. With the boys being no older than 8th graders, it’s hard to confirm how different age groups in our population would react to the hostile situations the boys were put into. “The desire to squeeze and hurt was over-mastering,” (page 115). After being on the island for that long, the violence that surrounded him, started to rub off onto him. Allowing us to see that the evil shown through his actions isn't nature, but nurture. Circling back, role models can be good or bad. In this case, the bad shined through because all respectable nurture was stripped away when they were stranded on that island. After the killing of the pig Ralph was not satisfied with the group's actions,”“Just a game,” said Ralph uneasily.” He was aware of what his conscience allowed, and afraid of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nature Vs. Nurture If a child hits another child, because he got his toy stolen, is it because of the way that the child was raised? Or is it simply because they are children? Well, that is where the debate ‘Nature Vs. Nurture’ comes into play. The way the child was raised is the ‘Nurture’ part of the debate, and the, “... because they are children,” part is the ‘ Nature’ part of the debate. A parent can not raise a child to be perfect. If a child is taught that hitting is bad, that does not guarantee…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature versus nurture is a wide know debate, asking what human nature is based on, what you are born with or how you are raised. Some believe that evilness is in your human nature and that you are born with it. Nature is genetics. A person’s nature is their height, size, hair, eyes, and race. Also, nature is instincts, behaviors that are formed without learning, evolved as an adaption to specific situations. But, others believe that you are born with nothing and evil is a result of the way you are…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nature versus Nurture debate can be traced back to a few millenniums ago, and to this day it continues to rattle our brains with its complexity. William Golding an english novelist wrote the book Lord of the flies in 1954 under the preconceived notion that every human is born with the propensity to do evil; as opposed to Jean-Jacques Rousseau a philosopher and writer of the 18th century who swears it is our environment that shapes us to be good or evil. Genetic influence over traits may exist;…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays