Nature Vs. Nurture In Lord Of The Flies

Improved Essays
Nature versus nurture is a wide know debate, asking what human nature is based on, what you are born with or how you are raised. Some believe that evilness is in your human nature and that you are born with it. Nature is genetics. A person’s nature is their height, size, hair, eyes, and race. Also, nature is instincts, behaviors that are formed without learning, evolved as an adaption to specific situations. But, others believe that you are born with nothing and evil is a result of the way you are raised and what you are exposed to as a child, nurture. Nurture is culture, which is the system of ideas about the nature of the world and how people should behave in it. Culture is the society the one is in, nationality and religion. Also, nurture …show more content…
When the boys start chanting about killing the pig, Ralph started to change and want to get to the pig too. The author describes, "The desire to squeeze and hurt was over-mastering,” (Golding 114). After being on the island for so long, it was not human nature that was making him have the desire to kill. Being around the savages and all of the violence on the island was beginning to rub off on him and that is what was taking over him. This shows that evil is nurture, not nature. Also, the People article, “Fatal Romance”, by Johnny Dodd, shows evilness in humans. Conrad Roy the third was debating whether or not to end his life and he was texting his girlfriend, Michelle Carter. Michelle texted him, “You're ready and prepared. . . All you have to do is turn on the generator and you [will] be free and happy” (Dodd 1). The reason that Michelle pushed her boyfriend so hard to commit suicide was because she felt unpopular and thought she would get attention from being a grieving girlfriend. Growing up in a town that prized popularity, she felt like she needed attention and to be popular and this was the way. She was not born with these traits, but they came with what she grew up with and around, another example that evilness comes from nurture rather than nature. In conclusion, evilness comes from nurture, not …show more content…
The article is about “A group of teenagers [that] laughed and watched as a man struggled in the water of a pond,” (Chokshi 1). It was not said if the teenagers had nothing physiologically wrong with them, but they thought it was funny or entertaining to watch and record while this helpless man drowned in a small pond in Florida. This is not in their nature, they were not born finding a man drowning funny. It had to be the boy's nurture that made them make these decisions. Also, in “Fatal Romance” Michelle confesses, “I could have stopped it. I was on the phone with him and he got out of the car because it was working and he got scared and I [expletive] told him to get back in,” (Dodd 1). Caring so much about attention, Michelle pushed her boyfriend to stay in the car in order for her to get the attention she desired. It was clear that he was irrelevant to her if it meant she would get attention. In conclusion, heartlessness is a taught characteristic, rather than something you are born

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ralph has been the primary representation of the civilization and order within the novel and with this, he was able to repress the savagery temptations, but soon enough, he begins to succumb to this nature. This was first seen when he wounded the pig and shouted, “I hit him all right. The spear stuck in. I wounded him” (Golding 113)! Although he was able to repress them for a while, he is no different from the other boys on the island since they are still all adolescents and are not immune to the evil that resides within them.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature's Truth The Nature vs. Nurture is the most common debatable subject in Psychology. Like whether personality is a nature or a nurture thing. I personally think that nature is the biggest predictor of personality and behaviour. And it refers to the range of traits, capacities and limitations that each person inherits genes from his or her parents at the moment of conception such as pigmentation of the skin, eye colour, body type, diseases, athletic ability, memory and etc. But some traits have a stronger tendency to get passed down like height and weight unlike shyness and intelligence which have some tendency to get passed down.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The nurture vs. nature debate is debated by many psychologist and sociologist. The nurture side of the debate is that a person’s traits are formed by the way one is raised. The nature aspect of the debate is that a person is born with and biologically given the traits that determine one’s perspective and personality. The authors of Psychology states that “Research reveals that nature and nurture together shape our development-every step of the way” (Myers 133). In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor’s god complex and, though he believes his happiness is based on nurture, he abandons his creature leaving him to develop through nature alone.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature vs Nurture In the book In Cold Blood by Truman Capote the two main characters Dick and Perry. Both of these people have messed up minds and are kind of psychotic but why are they like this? There could be many reasons why they turn out like this and dozens of answers why or excuses why. Although there are many some of the reasons could be they were raised this way or just naturally this way.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This may be true to some, but to others nurture plays a greater role to their immoral…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture via Frankenstein One’s true nature versus nurture upbringing has been a question long pondered before Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. A person is defined by nature and nurture. One does not outweigh the other. Many variables exist in the nature vs nurture debate. Human beings are not born evil any more than they can be bred to perform evil.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For as long as one can remember, Nature vs. Nurture has been an argument that has always been debated. Some believe that people are the way they are due to their biological make- up. While on the other hand, others believe that people are the way they are because of their experiences and what they have been through. Humans are like a mold of clay, experience is what forms us. We need good and bad experiences to shape who we are.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature vs nurture issue is a controversy about whether nature or nurture has a bigger influence on development. Nature is more of what humans are programmed to know. Nurture is what humans learn…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been several discussions over people’s actions and the reason why they behave in such a way. For example, is it because of epigenetics or through the experience they endure in their lifetime. This debate has become to be known as nature versus nurture. Nature is the idea that the way humans act is because of their genes and family history. Nurture is the idea that humans act due to their environments and their social interactions (their experiences).…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature Vs. Nurture The Nature Vs. Nurture situation is a prominent issue that has created debates for decades now. Throughout history, a phenomenal amount of tragedies have occurred that have made psychologist and the general people question if it is a person's genetics that make them do evil things or because of how they were raised (McLeod).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature versus nurture has been a debatable issue since as early as the 17th century in psychology. The issue consists on whether humans are how they are because of their nature or because how they are nurtured during child development. In a 2007 article, McLeod contributes that nature is what humans inherit while nurture is environmental influences. Researches and psychologists who are strong in their position of nature are called nativists. Meanwhile, the researchers and psychologists who agree on nurture are called empiricists (“Nature vs. Nurture, 2007, para.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The argument of nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and one of the largest controversies on whether our influences come from our genes (nature) or environmental factors (nurture), and how it could affect our behavioral, appearances, development, and our personality. These two play a big role in the human development. This argument will always exist on what is said about the human development. Scientists have not been able to sort this argument out and decide which one rules out the other.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orphanages and foster care are both terms that are frequently thrown around interchangeably, but in fact, they both describe two different methods of child care. An orphanage is an institution that is regulated by the state and federal government. This institution, where children live, is supervised by an adult staff and the needs for food, shelter, and medical care are taken care of by the institution. The foster care system or foster home is a home where children are placed temporarily due to an emergency in their biological family. All foster parents and foster homes are screened by an agency.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature versus Nurture "Nature versus Nurture" is one of the oldest argument of all time in history and it still continues until now. Beckett (2002) defined the nature as qualities and characteristics which are transmitted to humans directly from parents through genetics. While, nurture could be explained as "all external factors surrounding human beings from birth to death" (Beckett 2002). Wherefore, scientists confirm that the factors which influence human behavior are subdivided into three aspects.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever caught yourself acting like your mom or dad? Nature vs nurture debate is an interesting discussion about whether genetics or parenting has a bigger impact on our lives. Nature is genetics a pretty big thing to make the person we are today. But then we have another big part, nurture, which is the environment we live in. My opinion is that nurture is more powerful, because it is how we are raised and where we live.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays