Nature Theft

Theft is the main center of Nature, and equality goes against the rules of Nature. If Nature had wanted men to be equal, she would have given everyone the same abilities instead of making them all different. Men are given different talents with which they can use to steal. By dividing all men as either weak or strong and ensuring that they do not get an equal and fair share of things, Nature makes it clear that equality is not meant to exist and that it is unnatural. Man would not have been given the traits that allow them to steal if Nature had not meant for them to steal. Since animals are constantly stealing from each other so that they may live, Nature is clearly indicating that she approves of theft among men. If even animals must steal to only carry on living, then stealing cannot be considered a crime against Nature or against mankind since it is a way of maintaining life. Instead, it …show more content…
Instead they are trying to right the balance of Nature by reclaiming a small amount of what was taken away from them. It is also not a crime when the strong steal from those who already have little to start with. However, Nature supports the strong more than the weak in theft since the strong are simply making use of the strength and cruelty that they were given by Nature. The strong were given those qualities so they could take things away from the weak and exert their power over them. In comparison, the weak must use their cunning and wit instead of the brute strength and violence that the strong would use to steal. When the weak steal through turning to physical force instead of using their cunningness they are acting in ways that contradict their weak natures. In going against their natures, they are also going against Nature. The weak were not meant to steal through violence, because if they had been meant to use violence Nature would have given them the qualities in order to