Thomas Hobbes Laws Of Nature Analysis

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes’ laws of nature are a set of laws that would keep humanity from falling into the state of nature. This is a state of the world where we are in a constant state of war. The laws of nature are “articles of peace” that, if everyone or most people abided by, would keep the peace for all people interested in their self-preservation. Hobbes provides a set of nineteen laws which are “a rule of reason by which we are forbidden to do anything destructive to our life, ” (Chapter 15, page 68). The first three of these laws are as follows: First, “seek peace and follow it”(chapter 14, p. 60), second, everyone should be willing to transfer their natural rights, if others are also willing, to a sovereign power for the protection and security …show more content…
In the state of nature everyone is entitled to everything, therefore they would be allowed to break the peace whenever they wish out of their distrust, need for glory, or competition. “For as long as every man maintains his right to do anything he likes, all men are in the condition of war” (Chapter 15 p. 60). By following the first law, one gives up his/her right to break the peace. In return, they expect that others will also give up this right. They expect that they will not be attacked and everyone will be allowed to do what is best for their …show more content…
This kind of “covenant” cannot exist in the state of nature, because there is no assurance that either of the parties will perform their part of the deal. The parties would come to distrust one another and see no reason to follow through on their promises. The third law states that one should fulfill their contracts or covenants. Hobbes states this law is the “source of justice” ( Chapter 15,p.66). If someone was to fulfill their contract, it would be justice, and if they were to leave it incomplete, it would be injustice. No matter what the situation is, it would be unreasonable to break

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, Thomas Hobbes describes the state of nature and human beings as solely wanting power over one another. He states that nature makes humans equal from the start as so nobody is smarter or stronger from the beginning, but by how we allow ourselves to become. According to Hobbes, the state of nature has “no common ways of life, no enforced laws or moral rules, and no justice or injustice, for these concepts do not apply” (Hobbes, 66). In this quote he means that there is society would be incapable of existing except with the power of the state. He has the idea that humans would be incapable of governing themselves because eventually everyone would break out into chaos and lose all order they had.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why does Hobbes consider men equal in the State of Nature? Why does this eventually compel men to form a commonwealth? Hobbes describes a State of Nature as a society with no official government. This means that people would decide for themselves; how to conduct themselves, if someone is guilty of a crime, and if they are guilty of a crime, how they should be punished.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life. ”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interestingly enough, both Hobbes and Locke have a state of nature where mankind is an individualistic being that must protect him or herself, even though each one is very dissimilar to the other’s and to compare we must start by understanding what Hobbes’s state of nature was. Hobbes believed in the state of nature man had complete and total control of his own will in order to continue self-preservation. For example, if somebody felt that they needed to steal someone else’s cattle they could and there was no punishment. This lack of punishment in Hobbes’s state of nature is the first difference in Hobbes and Locke’s views of the state of nature. Because in Hobbes’s state of nature there was no enforcement of the laws of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of nature is a philosophical device used to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people may have been like prior to societies coming into existence. This foundation of thinking poses many different scenarios and questions about the state of nature. Where some theorists remain optimistic about a state of nature, others argue it would be disastrous and impossible without a government. The way, in which one envisions the society will have drastic consequences for how the state and function is perceived. Two prime examples we can look at today are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 15, Hobbes lays out the remaining 17 laws of nature in which should live by in order to have peace. While most of the laws are reasonable to follow, for example, law 17 states that no man should be his own judge when settling a dispute (pg. 104) or law 15 which says that all men who mediate peace be allowed safe conduct (pg. 103), however one of them in particular stood out to me was law 8. Law 8, which is found on pages 101-102, states that “that no man by deed, word, countenance, or gesture, declare hatred, or contempt of another.” This simply means that men should not show any anger towards another individual. Earlier in the text, Hobbes already implied that men live in a natural state of war and “wickedness” and this only changes…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I find Hobbes' claim regarding the unity of a covenant confounding. In Chapter Seventeen, Hobbes' refers to the covenant as a "real unity" of men who have consciously chosen to escape the natural world. However, in Chapter Sixteen Hobbes' states that the "multitude naturally is not one, but many; they cannot be understood for one." Thus, Hobbes' discredits the central pillar on which his argument stands.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He believed that society in order to be successful had to be ruled by a strict system of government such as absolute monarchy. In Hobbes’s dissertation “The Leviathan”(1651) a book where he expresses his views he explains that a law of nature was "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life” (Hobbes, 1651, ch14/XIV, p. 64). The law of nature was a broad principle which was discovered through experience and expected to be to be followed in everyday life. These laws encouraged self preservation and disapproved any doings damaging or negative to human life such a rebellions which could result in civil…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes claims that it is only after we create our covenants that the concept of right and wrong even comes into existence, because as he claims, in the natural state, “The notions of Right and Wrong, Justice and Injustice have there no place,” (Hobbes 188). Despite this Hobbes still believes certain things to be Laws of Nature, which are true even before the formation of covenants, and he defines such as Law as “a Precept, or generall rule, found out by Reason, by which a man is forbidden to do, that, which is destructive of his life, or taketh away the means of preserving the same,” (Hobbes 189). Here once again we see that theme of fear of violence and death. For Hobbes, preserving life, especially one’s own, is the ultimate Law of Nature, and is also what he defines as the Right of Nature, which he defines as “the Liberty each man hath, to use his own power, as he will himselfe, for the preservation of his own Nature,” (Hobbes 189). All of Hobbes Laws of Nature revolve around this same Right of Nature.…

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays