1. After the Reconstruction the freedman had a hard time. They had a hard time both with finding jobs and eating at times. The good thing was having the options to move to try and live better lives. So in the end, overall it was beneficial for being freed.
2. I don’t believe treating American Indians it that way could ever be justified. The fact that we “stole” there property, saying we bought the land by giving them next to nothing and no option to decline. For instance, the Sioux lost all there hunting land and wouldn’t be given their food from the ware house forcing them to sign treaties or starve.
3. I think the government should play a supportive roll for the country. Like when they supported the farmers by helping them to actually
2. I don’t believe treating American Indians it that way could ever be justified. The fact that we “stole” there property, saying we bought the land by giving them next to nothing and no option to decline. For instance, the Sioux lost all there hunting land and wouldn’t be given their food from the ware house forcing them to sign treaties or starve.
3. I think the government should play a supportive roll for the country. Like when they supported the farmers by helping them to actually