Native American Pipeline Case Study

Great Essays
To begin, I’d like to talk about the history of gaming and how it came to be, before getting into the pros and cons of gaming and how it is viewed by society. I came across a Native American website that really gave a great description of the early history of gaming. Gaming itself is not new to Native Americas, and has been a part of their culture for many generations, even to their very beginning. This isn’t in reference to the gambling we are familiar with today, that include card games or slot machines, rather, these games required skill and often involved a great deal of chance. “In modern times, large-scale gaming sponsored by tribal governments,” the gambling and casinos we are familiar with today, “started in the early 1980s. As lotteries began to …show more content…
I am referring to the Dakota access pipeline that is such a current, relevant, issue. This has been a very publicized conflict between all parties involved, and it just absolutely baffles me as to the reasoning why the new route is suggested. While the pipeline does not technically touch the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, if you were to ignore the Sioux Territory Under the 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie, it does cut through a waterway that borders the reservation. It is this waterway, the Missouri River to be exact, that is the reason the original route of the pipeline was changed. There were concerns over the drinking water that is supplied to the people in Bismarck. Now, if those people have concerns about their drinking water being tainted, and possibly even their land, don’t the Native Americans of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation have the very same right to be concerned? What bothers me, is that there are humans in both areas, Bismarck and Standing Rock, so how is something that is unfit for one area, okay for another. Neither area should be put at risk of an oil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Choctaw Indians Case Study

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indian (d) a) Although many Choctaw Indians did resist the removal, it was a quieter one than the others. b) After the Treaty of Fort Laramie (also called the Sioux Treaty of 1868,) the Sioux were granted the ownership of the Black Hills and hunting rights to various parts of South Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming. However, when gold was discovered in the Black Hills, gold prospectors began to violate the treaty, leading to the Black Hills War. When the U.S. government seized the Black Hills and offered the Sioux money for the land, they refused the money and demanded the land back.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Standing Rock protesters VS Army Corps of Engineers. A group of 200 Native Americans stood among the Standing Rock Indian Reservation on April 1st, 2016 to protest against the 3.7 billion Dakota Access oil pipeline. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a pipeline that transfers 470,000 barrels of unpurified oil from Bakken North Dakota to a terminus near Patoka, Illinois (Epstien, 2016). On July 26th, 2016, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved the final word for the land easement and water crossing to allow the pipeline to move forward.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota pipeline is a long pipe that will run crude oil from that will run from North Dakota all the way to south Illinois it will go through 4 states and it will be crossing Native American land that was given to them and now they want to take…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By taking legal action and looking for support from the many #NoDAPL activists that have fought for months at the spirit camps in North Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux hopes to make a difference against this controversial pipeline. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency behind the plan for the Dakota Access Pipeline, “probably thought their path forward was clear”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For more than seven months Native Americans protested against changes in their sacred land to keep tradition and to preserve the primitive land. The Native Americans were, for the first time, joined by other Americans to protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline. In “An Indian Protest for Everyone”, David Treuer explains and builds an argument that Native Americans at Standing Rock have developed a new method of protesting. Treuer uses different language choices and persuasive elements to strengthen his argument.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the signing of executive order, protesting about the pipeline has been an ongoing event. The main protester against the Dakota Pipeline is a tribe known as the Standing Rock Sioux (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). Their key concern is the pipeline being tunneled under Lake Oahe, which is a section…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Native Americans is entirely made up of violence since then, as the hostile government policies of today and demolition of cultural identities further strip what were problems since the 1830s and beyond. The Standing Rock Sioux fear the pipeline will pollute their drinking water, and claim that it will disturb ancient burial grounds and has violated the terms of a prior 1851…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline has received a lot of attention in the media for the past several months and once again constitute a polemic topic in our nation. It is hard for the U.S. government to understand the value and to even know which places are sacred for Native Americans. However, I believe by now U.S government should better understand their religion and beliefs. I mean they acknowledge that it’s a consistent problem they face, As legal scholar Stephen Pevar tells us, in the article named“Native American Relgiion and Dakota Access Pipeline Crisis: “There is no federal statute that expressly protects Indian sacred sites…. in fact, the federal government knowingly desecrates sites.”…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dakota Pipeline Case Study

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The pipeline will be going right outside the Standing Rocks Sioux Tribes reservation. Per Members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, developers building the Access Pipeline demolished an ancient burial site sacred to the Sioux (quoted by Morris). The main issue that would have the largest impact is the drinking water source and this potential contamination. The pipelines construction path is right under their water source. If the pipeline was to burst or have some sort of leak, it would contaminate their drinking water, along with destroying the natural habitat in the…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It also implicitly recognizes the importance of the natural environment for the survival of tribal cultures, which are rooted in the natural world. In addition, incorporating standards with culturally specific uses of resources is considered very crucial aspect of self-determination, sovereignty and, eventually, tribal survival. However, these legal-political frameworks have not been able to fully protect the Native sovereignty. For example, the issue of “fracking” as empirical evidence indicates that since the federal environmental regulatory laws are administered and enforced by states, the tribal governments are resource constraint to face challenges in developing regulatory programs. This “structural” inequality in the environmental protection infrastructure weakens the capacity of the tribal governments to effectively resist the controversial “fracking” technique to protect their territory and sovereignty.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article declares that the initial route was dangerously close neighboring homes and in an effort to protect nearby wells that supply drinking water, the government changed the pipeline’s path. Furthermore, the article states that the new route was, for the most part, chosen for it’s already existing infrastructure. While the story highlights actual problems presented in the first routing draft and logical reasoning for the second, the real issue mentioned is the lack of consultation and consideration for the native community on the part of the government. The Sioux tribe did not receive the same caution and review for the effects of this pipeline as another group did. In “Standing Rock and the Erosion of Tribal Rights”, Penn-Roco writes, “Tribes are sovereign nations.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The Keystone Pipeline was a proposed idea of a pipeline that would run from the oil sands of Canada to Steele City, Nebraska (“Keystone” 1). It would then connect with an existing pipeline that would administer it elsewhere. Since the proposal was for an oil pipeline that would cross international borders, it needed the President’s approval. The idea became such a controversial topic when President Obama stated that six days to decide the fate of this project was not a sufficient amount of time to make a decision.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the Standing Sioux Rock Tribe is protesting the Dakota Access oil pipeline which is supposed to span 1,100 miles across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa. In this case the protestors are also worried about contamination of their sacred water…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, treaty rights, which are the supreme law of the land, outlined in Article 6 Clause 2, further establishes that tribal law should be guaranteed full protection under the Constitution's rubric. Thus when state and federal laws conflict with these treaties, they should be deemed invalid. Finally, the Reserved Rights Doctrine, identified in United States v Winans, holds that any rights not specifically addressed in treaties are reserved to the tribe. Currently, the Standing Rock Sioux tribes fight against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline is a testament to the ongoing degradation of our native people. This issue encompasses tribal political independence, treaties, and water rights in regards to the Reserved Rights Doctrine.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays