The British-Europeans blood-thirsty civilization in the nation of Australia was jeopardous to the Indigenous natives in the 18th-20th century in many implications. Firstly, it caused the outbreak of chronic diseases, such as tuberculosis, measles, chickenpox, smallpox and influenza. Yet, little did the Europeans know that the harsh syndromes were introduced to the nation, as a result of their arrival. It also made the nation more and more susceptible to the dramatic decline in the Indigenous population, as there was lack of medical knowledge of contaminants/disease at that time. Another controversial health issue that the natives confronted, was malnutrition, as they faced the lack in the traditional food supply that they were dependant on,
…show more content…
The Europeans stereotyped and judged the natives as imbeciles and leeches that should be rubbished and named them other racist labels, as they were denoted as rascals that came into the whites business. The controversial loathe between the two bloods exaggerated, and this led to bloodshed to more bloodshed. It ruined their legacy and left the natives vulnerable for centuries; just to blame the cruel stereotypes and the lack of native-black acceptance in white society. However, the Europeans kept expanding and Australia became controversial as a territory of convicts, settlers and as a civilized nation in the late 18th to 20th century. This is why massacres, such as the Myall Creek Massacre (1838), frontier wars and the black face of Australia began to reveal, because of the fight of both parties. The wars and the killing sprees were most relevant in this late Australian society because of the high blood raging politics between the European and the Indigenous, which thus left a history of bloodshed. For instance, the Myall Creek Massacre was a holocaust, which was depicted as the most controversial genocide in Australian history, marking the murder of 28 vulnerable Indigenous men, women and children, where European massacrers were actually persecuted and bloodshed for their
The Europeans stereotyped and judged the natives as imbeciles and leeches that should be rubbished and named them other racist labels, as they were denoted as rascals that came into the whites business. The controversial loathe between the two bloods exaggerated, and this led to bloodshed to more bloodshed. It ruined their legacy and left the natives vulnerable for centuries; just to blame the cruel stereotypes and the lack of native-black acceptance in white society. However, the Europeans kept expanding and Australia became controversial as a territory of convicts, settlers and as a civilized nation in the late 18th to 20th century. This is why massacres, such as the Myall Creek Massacre (1838), frontier wars and the black face of Australia began to reveal, because of the fight of both parties. The wars and the killing sprees were most relevant in this late Australian society because of the high blood raging politics between the European and the Indigenous, which thus left a history of bloodshed. For instance, the Myall Creek Massacre was a holocaust, which was depicted as the most controversial genocide in Australian history, marking the murder of 28 vulnerable Indigenous men, women and children, where European massacrers were actually persecuted and bloodshed for their