National Security Agency Summary

Improved Essays
Implemented by Senator Ted Kennedy and signed into law by President Carter in 1978 “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was introduced to sanction procedures for requesting judicial approval for electronic surveillance and physical search of persons engaged in espionage or international terrorism against the United States on behalf of a foreign power. But in 2013, a young contractor/whistleblower named Edward Snowden released a series of detailed disclosures of internal documents to the public about the NSA (National Security Agency) regarding its spying techniques on international and domestic activities using the said law. The article written by Bruce Schneider in the IEEE journal for the September 2015 Issue “Ubiquitous Surveillance and Security” focuses on the severity of the matter.
One of the reports that came to light regarding documents leaked by Snowden mentions that the NSA collects cell phone records of every American. When inquired, the NSA said that they weren’t prying but was simply collecting metadata. By which they meant that they weren’t listening to every conversation (words) an individual has but just the phone numbers
…show more content…
It collects the most intimate data for surveillance. It’s understood that one doesn’t lie to its search engine for we always type exactly what we need. One might say google knows you better than you do. What makes a google search engine a risk is that though you are able to see you google searches with your login you have no authority to delete them .In an interview with John Oliver , Snowden explained how google search engine works .He said “Google moves data from data center to data center—invisibly to use without your knowledge—your data could be moved outside the borders of the United States, temporarily. When your junk was passed by Gmail, the NSA caught a copy of that… PRISM is how they pull your junk out of Google with Google’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Improvements

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The USA PAtriot Act allowed federal government agencies to listen to telephone conversations at anytime and record what one may say if they suspect a terrorist or anyone talking to a terrorist so agencies and tap the phone. Alongside the phone tapping the patriot act lets the government track review emails at any time and they pay attention to who that person email. Now that the patriot act surveillance was added, major search engine providers such as google and microsoft have turned over users records to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisa Pros And Cons

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Several benefits of FISA have over years been witnessed. Since its enactment, FISA has been an important tool in the fight against intelligence collection by foreign powers or its agents with an aim of exploiting the underlying US government policies or even to establish its future strategies illegally. The USA Patriot Act has seen FISA expand its strategies in exposition of foreign terrorist groups and combating them in good time. This has seen the US government win the war against terrorism and extremism. The Act has also see reduction of purported threats and acts of terrorism to national security.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ever since people became concerned about the amount of power given to the NSA, there were proposals to alter the bill to hold the government agency more accountable for their actions and place limits on who and what they can actually search, however the version passed by the House of Representatives left many of the more prominent issues unattended to. The current bill in place “requires the government to limit any requests for records to a ‘specific selection term’ but it defines ‘specific selection term’ broadly” (Sloan) This is one of the many loopholes placed in the bill allowing the government to search almost anything they want if they see the need without a warrant. “Credible evidence indicates that billions of everyday communication of ordinary Americans are swept up by government computers and run through a process that includes both data-mining and review of content.” (Cohn)…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Privacy is not an option, and it shouldn't be the price we accept for just getting on the Internet,” stated Gary Kovacs the president of several software companies (Kovacs). However, since the implementation of the Patriot Act in 2001, the loss of American privacy is one of the many results of the new set of revised laws that have been rewritten to give the government more freedom in observing our electronic fingerprint (“Surveillance Under the Patriot Act”). In their hurry to act on the tragedy of 9/11, Congress passed the Act a mere 45 days of the event, with little to no debate. The result of it’s ratification, was a drastic change in the surveillance laws and restrictions of the federal government (“End Mass Surveillance Under the Patriot…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    *The NSA shouldn’t be spying on citizens because it is a violation of the U.S citizens rights, causes a psychological affect, and they have an inefficient system that wrongfully accuses people *. The NSA and telecommunication companies are betraying people’s trust by violating their privacy. One major telecommunication company…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org).…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violation Of The NSA

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    But, can this action be declared as unconstitutional? Some people have grown to have a very serious problem with this action that the NSA is able to perpetrate. Some argue that the NSA’s ongoing right to view and collect media on cellular devices is in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides the civil liberties for individuals to be secure in persons, residence, and documentation as well as not being subject to unreasonable searches and seizures. In this paper, I will explore and discuss what rights we as people give up for a democracy, how privacy rights are not specifically stated in the Constitution, and how the NSA is not in violation of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    H.L Mencken (1880 - 1956), an American essayist and social critic once wrote, “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.” In other words, Mencken claimed that humans prioritize safety over freedom. That means a man will gladly give up anything, including his rights and liberties, to acquire the protection he desires. This quote contradicts with the belief that America had been built upon.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (BBC News. Snowden, Jan. 17, 2014). These surveillance issues caused for a public backlash against government surveillance and the NSA. The majority of Americans disapprove of the NSA’s collection of telephone records and more and more people are beginning to be concerned about the country’s lack of civil liberty protection because they don’t believe their liberties should be sacrificed in the name of counter-terrorism. (Civil Liberty in America, Gao, G May 29, 2015).…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New technologies are putting more pressure on the boundaries of privacy. New ways are emerging that aid in tracking private information on individuals. No matter what new technology emerges, individual privacy rights should be respected at all levels. Americans are concerned of how to maintain an equilibrium between their personal privacy rights and the need for government to track potential terrorist threats since Edward Snowden leaked National Security Agency's (NSA) documents which included collections of information regarding data from cellphone and internet of millions of Americans. Freedom, privacy and safety are the rights of Americans and should not be compromised to confirm safety from terrorism.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 26, 2011, President Barack Obama signed a bill that reauthorized some parts of the Patriot Act. This bill called for a four year renewal of some provisions of the surveillance issues. Even though most of the Patriot Act is still in the law, there are some parts that congress has to reauthorize periodically or they will “expire.” One of these things is the wire taps. This is the ability of law enforcements to look at phones to track targets without consulting a judge first.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although initially defending their actions, Google agreed to dismantle their bypassing mechanisms. The first event, appeared an unintended consequence of using complex technology; however, the timeliness of their response creates an ominous tone around their data collection processes. The second instance shows a clear violation of their own core principle of doing no evil as well as violating users’ right to informed consent. These events are unacceptable for a company that…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most critics of surveillance argue about how it is an abuse of power, a violation of people 's privacy, and most importantly, unconstitutional, while proponents of surveillance claim the benefit of surveillance is a reduction in the probability of high-cost events such as terrorism. Government surveillance programs, when conducted in controlled situations and closely audited by independent organizations, do not directly harm innocent civilians, especially when they benefit the safety of the general public. Surveillance, by definition, is the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime. If that definition was used when discussing the issue of government surveillance, most public safety activities,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays