However, in result of families’ lack of wealth to fund all the children of the household, most parents choose to send only the boys to school. Another economic factor restricting their education is the lack of teaching female figures. Due to severe punishments and the abuse these girls may face, schools require female staff members; however, it is difficult to finance such additions with insufficient budgets. Hence, many young girls are not allowed to be in school to prevent such violent situations from occurring. Furthermore, a social circumstance hindering their school life is child marriages. As caretakers of the household, they are given domestic responsibilities ("Girls' Education and Gender Equality") like, cooking and cleaning, which
…show more content…
In fact, the dissimilarity between incomes is specifically seen in United States workplaces, as “female workers are still paid only 77¢ for every dollar their male colleagues make” (Waber). For instance, in the field of nursing, which is greatly influenced by women, there is an imbalance between the salaries of male and female nurses. This is verified by contributors who took place in surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses and the American Community Survey. The results of one questionnaire established that the difference between the salaries varied from 9,163 to 9,961 dollars, and the second poll showed a discrepancy of 10,243 to 11, 306 dollars. There was even a difference within nurses who perform medical treatments for patients who are not admitted to the hospital; this gap was in the spectrum of 3,783 to 7,676 dollars (“Male nurses earn more than female nurses: Study”). These outcomes show that despite the amount of ladies who are in nursing, men are more financially rewarded in health service departments. Correspondingly, another instance in which discrepancies in incomes are shown is through female lawyers’ salaries. This was proven through an experiment administered on law school graduates who received their diploma amidst the years of 1972 and 1978, as well as, the years between 1979 and 1985. These alumni began their careers with the same paychecks, “but 15 …show more content…
For instance, in recent years, results of several studies display that a majority of authoritative figures at companies are males. In fact, one of the studies showed that “A mere 4.2 percent of chief executive officers at Fortune 500 companies are women” (Waber). Almost 96 percent of America’s most elite establishments are managed by men (Waber). This means there are fewer opportunities in the nation for ladies to claim high-ranking positions. Many believe successful corporations are run by males due to their experience and work ethics; however, women are just as qualified. This is shown as Ben Waber, CEO of a firm known as Sociometric Solutions, had his team investigate a medicine company to find the rationale behind this subject. His findings showed that “women were fractionally (0.2 percent) more likely to be promoted than men based on our model. Yet only 13 percent of top executives at the company are female despite a 50-50 gender split in the overall workforce” (Waber). Based on the data, girls have equal if not further capabilities as men in the workplace, but they are not granted half of these promotions, thus not given the opportunity to go beyond their potential level (Waber). In result, scarcity in female advancement exhibits differences between
In fact, the dissimilarity between incomes is specifically seen in United States workplaces, as “female workers are still paid only 77¢ for every dollar their male colleagues make” (Waber). For instance, in the field of nursing, which is greatly influenced by women, there is an imbalance between the salaries of male and female nurses. This is verified by contributors who took place in surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses and the American Community Survey. The results of one questionnaire established that the difference between the salaries varied from 9,163 to 9,961 dollars, and the second poll showed a discrepancy of 10,243 to 11, 306 dollars. There was even a difference within nurses who perform medical treatments for patients who are not admitted to the hospital; this gap was in the spectrum of 3,783 to 7,676 dollars (“Male nurses earn more than female nurses: Study”). These outcomes show that despite the amount of ladies who are in nursing, men are more financially rewarded in health service departments. Correspondingly, another instance in which discrepancies in incomes are shown is through female lawyers’ salaries. This was proven through an experiment administered on law school graduates who received their diploma amidst the years of 1972 and 1978, as well as, the years between 1979 and 1985. These alumni began their careers with the same paychecks, “but 15 …show more content…
For instance, in recent years, results of several studies display that a majority of authoritative figures at companies are males. In fact, one of the studies showed that “A mere 4.2 percent of chief executive officers at Fortune 500 companies are women” (Waber). Almost 96 percent of America’s most elite establishments are managed by men (Waber). This means there are fewer opportunities in the nation for ladies to claim high-ranking positions. Many believe successful corporations are run by males due to their experience and work ethics; however, women are just as qualified. This is shown as Ben Waber, CEO of a firm known as Sociometric Solutions, had his team investigate a medicine company to find the rationale behind this subject. His findings showed that “women were fractionally (0.2 percent) more likely to be promoted than men based on our model. Yet only 13 percent of top executives at the company are female despite a 50-50 gender split in the overall workforce” (Waber). Based on the data, girls have equal if not further capabilities as men in the workplace, but they are not granted half of these promotions, thus not given the opportunity to go beyond their potential level (Waber). In result, scarcity in female advancement exhibits differences between