National Rifle Association (NRA): A Case Study

Great Essays
In order to understand the National Rifle Association (NRA), one must first understand special interest groups. These are groups of citizens that share a common belief. Their goal is to influence policy through political participation for the benefit of themselves and their members. They accomplish these goals through campaigning, voting initiatives, influencing those running for office or having members run for office themselves. Look up any number of issues and you will find competing views on either, usually on different sides of the spectrum. Views such as traditional marriage v.s. marriage equality, immigration v.s. anti-immigration and of course, gun rights v.s. gun control (to name a few) are all serviced by special interest groups. …show more content…
They started out as an advocate for rifle marksmanship, while also teaching firearm safety. In the early days of the organization they published magazines, held competitions, informed the public and lobbied legislators in matters pertaining to their members. These are all things that a good special interest group is supposed to do for its members, the NRA does this very well. Today the organization’s list of responsibilities is about the same, they train local police departments, conduct firearm safety and marksmanship proficiency and many members are also a huge hunting enthusiasts (LaPierre). At the same time, he organization has changed over the past several years. The NRA is putting a great deal of time and effort into lobbying, they have transformed into a front group for the firearms industry. It should be noted that the NRA itself is a tax-exempt organization that is not allowed to lobby or campaign party/candidate. They are an over four and a half million member strong special interest organization and growing. With members the likes of Chuck Norris, Sarah Palin and Whoopi Goldberg, who wouldn’t want to join? Also, it doesn’t hurt that the organization’s President for some time was Charlton Heston. Yes, …show more content…
The NRA, lobbies for or against legislation that will benefit or hurt their members through one of their subsidiaries (and there are many) like the Institute for Legislative Action (Cooper, pg 2). They have taken up numerous cases against the Federal Government and other agencies and won. In the wake of the Columbine massacre, lawmakers attempted to close gaps in the Brady Bill that allowed firearms sold at gun shows to be sold without background checks or the mandatory waiting period. They lost overwhelmingly and those gaps were never closed. The NRA took on the Center for Disease Control (CDC), stating that research done by the CDC was biased in favor of gun control. John Ashcroft, a favorite among executive officers in the NRA, was a political appointee as attorney general during the Bush administration. Under Ashcroft’s watch of the Justice Department, he facilitated the adopted of individual right, as opposed to a collective right, when it came to the Second Amendment. They took on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, forbidding the agency from being able to release data on what kinds of firearms are being used for what crimes. They willfully fought to keep this information from the public and won (Diaz). Probably the fiercest fight that the organization has had was one reminiscent of one the tobacco industry had, where individuals could sue the industry for damages if

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The NIRA, as discussed earlier created two new federal agencies, the NRA and the PWA. These new government appendages were charged with boosting the nation’s economy. The PWA took on enormous public works and conservation programs. While the NRA directly involved the federal government into private business…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These groups are made up of likeminded individuals working together to change political policy without running for office. These groups include National Rifle Association, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Teacher Unions and many more. With outside lobbying, specific interest groups can try to change politics in an indirect way by paying the media, bloggers, and advertise to sway politics without talking to politicians. Inside lobbying, groups can try to change politics in a direct way by going to the politician and asking for certain demands or paying for their campaign to make sure they meet the needs they want.…

    • 3876 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proof of this can be found in the writings of the “Father of the Constitution,” James Madison. In Federalist Paper #46 Madison talks about the militia which would outnumber the standing army by at least 10 to one being able to oppose the army in defense of their liberty and freedoms. Coincidently, this clearly makes the case for the militia bearing equal armament to the nations standing army, and who is the militia? Simply put, according to United States Code, Title 10 section 311, the militia is comprised of all United States citizens over the age of 17 and who are able to bear arms. Now, on to the National Rifle Association; yes, they are a political lobbying group, however first and foremost, the NRA is a training organization, teaching firearms safety and competent marksmanship ever since its founding in 1871 by two retired Union Army Officers.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Nra

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The National Rifle Association, also known as the NRA, is a non-profit organization in the United States that advocates for gun rights. The NRA is a successful organization that has attracted many members from all across the country. According to the NRA foundation, the NRA is “widely recognized today as a major political force and as America's foremost defender of Second Amendment rights, the NRA has, since its inception, been the premier firearms education organization in the world” (NRA). The NRA prides it selves on gun safety and second amendment rights but has also been criticized for being a major contributor of gun violence in the United States. The National Rifle Association is having positive effects on public safety, second amendment…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control Dbq

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Because of the debates between the two parties, the law is delayed indefinitely. Then owing to the intervention of the National Rifle Association, the gun control becomes more difficult. The origins of the NRA could trace back to the American Civil War. There are eight American presidents who are members of this system in the history.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The organization actively fights legislature that would enact gun control laws. Gun control laws are used to protect people and not to infringe on their rights. The way the National Rifle Association fights legislator seems like they want anyone and everyone to have a gun. The NRA is right when stating that guns are a constitutional right, but they are wrong in saying who should get them. Giving someone a gun that was deemed mentally unstable should not be given a gun.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This was seen in the frontline video as citizens repeatedly tried to get a stronger grip on gun control against the NRA, but failed due to the NRA blocking new gun control legislations despite the majority wanting stricter gun laws. The NRA is more powerful because their supporters are more organized and passionate than the people who wanted stricter gun control. I quote our president Obama as he said, “this is not going to change unless the people who want to prevent these kinds of mass shootings from taking place feel at least as passionate and are at least as mobilized and well-funded and organized as the NRA and the gun manufacturers are” (Gunned Down: ‘The power of the NRA). This correlates that interest groups are superior in financial resources and it is crucial for them to out strategize their…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1977 through a shakeup within the NRA, the organization went from being a group of hunters and sportsmen to being a strong advocate for the right to bear arms. Catering towards strong gun advocates, the NRA was able to become a very powerful and influential organization. By aggressively advocating for gun rights, and preying on Republican congressmen with many pro-gun constituents, they were able to build up a support foundation, which they have now expanded into becoming one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington. Nowadays, they promote the 2nd Amendment, but only the parts of it they want to, specifically almost cutting the part of well regulated militia out of public consciousness. The NRA has used many quotes from the framers to enhance their gun rights cause.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Austin, I used to be an NRA member, I am not going to dispute what the law currently allows and that the second amendment was meant for a “well regulated militia”, however your statement “The NRA made a pledge to stand against any legislation that would limit the 2nd Amendment”, does not stand up to the history (until recently) of the NRA. I have read “the Second Amendment: A Biography, many Second Amendment articles and our current class textbook, for reference to my thinking. The NRA was founded in 1871, it was one of the first organizations in favor of gun controls, in fact it was not only committed to gun control laws, it helped to write most of them, until the 1980’s. In the 1920’s the National Revolver Association (a sister organization…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When I read Dave Cullen's Columbine, I became even angrier with the NRA. They held their annual conference in Denver just weeks after the shooting in Columbine. I found this to be the start of Americans believing the NRA is selfish. They are a corporation, of course they will try to benefits themselves as much as possible. Today, the NRA lobby is starting…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Cons

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They are referred to as gun rights activists. The most prominent gun rights advocacy group is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The National Rifle Association promotes the “right-to-carry” laws, which means people have the right to carry a concealed handgun in public. Mark Gius is an economist at Quinnipiac University who found that limiting people’s right to carry increases a state’s homicide rate by 10 percent (Rosen). There are many who call for stricter gun control measures and laws.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ineffective Gun Control

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first federal gun control law was added in 1934 by Franklin D. Roosevelt. The first federal gun control law was called the National Firearms Act. Eighty-one years later and the gun control issue have not been solved. One of the reasons that the gun control issue has not been solved is due to the ineffective background check in gun shows, online sales, and at some gun stores. The background check system is ineffective because the mentally unstable and criminals are still able to possess and use guns on a daily basis which will cause harm to innocent people.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that has spawned a tremendous amount of debate over the past few years. Most of the debates occur when there are mass shootings at schools, churches, or other public places. Mallory Simons is a writer and senior producer of online presentations for CNN. She wrote Gun Debate: Where is the Middle Ground on January 31, 2013 and it appeared on CNN.com the same day. In her article she discussed recent acts of gun violence and the effect they have had on the gun control debate.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays