National Curriculum In The Real World

More than two out of five (42 percent) college students are not adequately prepared by the education they received in high school. The National Curriculum aims towards core skills and key learning areas. Also, it has not been modified in over 20 years, and everything in life is steady transitioning, becoming more effective in the real world. Going through grades 1-12, allows students to accept the fact that life continues to get more stressful, but does not realize the learning concepts are not beneficial in the real world. Schools do not prepare students for life in the real world, how well it fits in with other policies and strategies, and Should there be a National Curriculum; these are questions everyone asks. This country should be taught in this incredibly …show more content…
“ No attempt seems to have been made… to conceptualise the national curriculum priorities in educational term, writes Chris Berg” The school board does not make any attempt to improve the curriculum for the younger and older generations yet to come. Students are learning things that won’t benefit them in the long run, and nothing is being changed or done about it. “The National Curriculum is not really a national curriculum at all, but instead a blank slate onto various players can impose their own ideas. This is an indictment on education establishment, writes Chris Berg” Everybody is using their own ideas instead of gathering information from students and teachers on how they should improve the curriculum. Also, they need to talk to job owners and see what most individuals lack coming out of high school. Students eyes are wide open, but steady going down the wrong path and clueless begin their life in the new world. Some people will understand the concepts in order to survive in life and others are struggling because schools didn’t teach them the key concepts of the real