Nathanson's Argument Against The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Nathanson’s main point is that the capital punishment is a form of cruel and unusual punishment, denying individuals of their human desert (natural rights that don’t need to be earned and cannot be taken away) and setting a bad example for the rest of society. No matter anyone’s actions, they retain a certain level of dignity and should the state infringe upon this, the state thus promotes violence and its continuation (in the form of retaliation). While respecting the law is important, we must always be critical of it as injustice can always become present.

A counterargument to Nathanson’s ideas would discuss cruel and unusual punishment. If it is the basis for the argument against the death penalty, then why is solitary confinement

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The family of an Ohio inmate whose Thursday execution took nearly 25 minutes and was marked with ten minutes of gasping and struggling will file a lawsuit over the circumstances of his death. Dennis McGuire was put to death using a combination of intravenous drugs that had never before been used in a lethal injection execution. John Paul Rion, the attorney representing McGuire’s children in their lawsuit, said at a press conference that the execution violated McGuire’s constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment. “I can’t think of any other way to describe it than torture,” daughter Amber McGuire said in a statement. While fighting last week to block the execution, McGuire’s lawyers argued that the new drug combination could…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book Capital Punishment by Michael Kronenwetter . He talks about how capital punishment was favorable for our country. He explained the power of the death sentence and how it helped the government and the people of the United States. He explained how the capital punishment was a deterrent for people. That anyone who would think about committing a murder would think before because they would be afraid of the consequence.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson argues that the decision should be made by the majority. He affirms that while some claim that criminals deserve death penalties for their sins, many regard death penalty as a threat to innocent lives instead of the guilty. Because government’s goal of protecting innocent citizens’ lives is more important than executing harmful individuals, governments should go with the majority and stop executions. Nathanson also argues that the cost of death sentences and execution procedures are far more expensive than the benefit of executing criminals. Finally, Nathanson argues that our legal system is not compatible with capital punishment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, a man named Mark Klaas was interviewed about how he felt after the man who kidnapped and murdered his daughter, was executed. His response was that he was disappointed that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice had been fulfilled. Mark now knows that the man that killed his twelve year-old, will never cause harm to anyone else. But what if the court had decided that it was not a "heinous" murder? Closure is what the death penalty brings to many hurting families, which is why the death penalty should be allowed in any murder cases where someone was proven guilty.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scheduled execution date? February 6, 2006. Convicted murderer Michael Morales one hour before his scheduled lethal injection was notified that the procedure would be postponed due to two court-appointed anesthesiologist withdrawing from the procedure. The reasoning behind withdrawal? The licensed physicians.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of solitary confinement is to correct the corrupt minds and actions of the inmates. Research has shown that once an inmate gets out of solitary confinement, they are more likely to commit another crime, but this time it would be more violent. It really is all inmates, that once they are back in their civilian life they are more likely to commit another crime. So, what is the point of all these levels of prison and extreme conditions if they are just going to turn around and do it again? (Neyfakh, “Ex-cons back in prison”) “A 2001 study of recidivism in Connecticut found that prisoners who had been held in solitary confinement were about 50 percent more likely to be rearrested within three years than those who had not” (Vera, “Ending Solitary Confinement”).…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Solitary confinement should be removed from the U.S. prison system, due to the severe adverse mental and physical impacts it has on any person subjected to it. Prison is meant not only to keep away the dangerous people in society, but it is meant to reform and rehabilitate those people so they can actually function in society once they’re released. There are over 2.4 million people currently in prison in America, and statistically speaking over 50% of those people will become re-offenders after they are released. According to a report done by the Department of Justice, 404,638 state prisoners were released in 2005. After approximately three years, 67.8% of those released prisoners committed another crime.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson believes the death penalty is completely justified, but in most cases it could be unjustified in practice. Legal judiciaries that impose the death penalty are not the ones leading to the execution of innocent humans. Nathanson also suggested the death penalty is inconsistent with the value of justice in society specifically. Nathanson’s argument is inconsistent with the value of justice, because the death penalty was imposed due to the extent of the specific crimes committed. Frankly in practice, actual death sentences are the result of…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a very controversial issue where can be found with long standing application in countries such as the united states Hugo A. Bedau expresses his opinion that the death penalty is the form of human brutality and stupidity that goes against human dignity. Claiming that the death penalty is ineffective way to deter future offenses. Bedau also argues that the government uses death penalty in hopes of bringing fear to individuals and by displaying superior power that their fate lies in their hands. Deterrence is an act that influences people to not do something, creating fear and thus reducing crimes. Many of us are convinced when a particular punishment receives severe consequences that it will deter behavior from reacquiring.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These individuals, such as rapists, child-molesters or murderers, are more likely to face attacks from other inmates and therefore many believe solitary confinement is a viable option in allowing them to serve out their sentences…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient. I. Monetary Cost a. Texas i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays