Introduction-- main claim What would you do if you were found guilty for a murder you did not commit and you were sentenced to prison for life?.That was the case for 17 year old adnan syed he was found guilty for the murder of 18 year old hae min lee. At the time they were both attending Woodlawn high school near Baltimore, Maryland at the time they were boyfriend and girlfriend but i will get to that later. I personally believe that adnan syed was guilty for the murder of hae min lee on the night of january 13 1999. One reason i believe this is i think he was jealous of haes new boyfriend so he decided to kill her.
Paragraph #2 Adnan syed was friends with former high school student jay wilds who also went to the same school as adnan. Jay wilds was a witness to what happened to hae because at the time Jay Wilds was adnan inside man. Jay confessed to the cops that adnan was guilty.I believe his story to prove that adnan is guilty because Jay had said he saw hae min lee's body in the back of her truck in the bestbuy parking lot. Another reason i believe he is guilty because there was inconsistencies in adnan story. …show more content…
So another piece of evidence that convinces me that Adnan is guilty because in the podcast is was proving that the location of the cell towers were pinging where the phone calls were being made were not matching the time on the call log that they had. The police had a call log for every call made by Adnan on that day. However, the time of when the calls were being made did not match the location on where the phone calls were being pinged by the cell
Paragraph #2 Adnan syed was friends with former high school student jay wilds who also went to the same school as adnan. Jay wilds was a witness to what happened to hae because at the time Jay Wilds was adnan inside man. Jay confessed to the cops that adnan was guilty.I believe his story to prove that adnan is guilty because Jay had said he saw hae min lee's body in the back of her truck in the bestbuy parking lot. Another reason i believe he is guilty because there was inconsistencies in adnan story. …show more content…
So another piece of evidence that convinces me that Adnan is guilty because in the podcast is was proving that the location of the cell towers were pinging where the phone calls were being made were not matching the time on the call log that they had. The police had a call log for every call made by Adnan on that day. However, the time of when the calls were being made did not match the location on where the phone calls were being pinged by the cell