Moral Luck Nagel Analysis

Decent Essays
To begin, I believe moral luck is moral blame or moral praise for our actions. Nagel discusses four ways in which the ‘natural objects of moral assessment “seem subject to moral luck”. First issue of luck would be the “way things turn out”. Next would be luck in constitutive factors, facts about the kind of person one is. Third is luck in one’s circumstances, which maybe situations one must face. Last one would be choices a person make in a particular circumstance, could be determined by luck. Nagel suggests that “in a sense the problem has no solution”. Nagel argues that we cannot abandon the idea that an agent must have control over the factors that are normally relevant. However we can abandon the judgments we make in particular cases that …show more content…
We all go through down falls in life and there is not luck that could help us with those down falls we face. Just because you have good morals doesn’t mean bad things won’t come your way and break you down. Vice versa, like people who may not have good morals might rise and have a good outcome. You never know what will happen in your life it’s all by chance. I don’t agree that if you do good, good things will come because there is people out there who have good morals and do well for others. But in the end they may get a bad outcome such as cancer or losing a love …show more content…
Nagel concludes that if there is a solution to the problem, we can find it only by acquiring a better understand of freedom of the will. I honestly believe we will never understand why bad things happen to good people and why good things happen to people we think don’t deserve the good outcome. It all comes back to god and the fate he has planned for us. An example I would use to explain that we will never understand why these things happen and that luck is no such thing. If god wants something good or bad to happen to us, it’s going to happen no matter what we

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The problem of moral luck, as Nagel argues, is that many, if not all, of our actions are out of our control yet we continue to assign moral judgment. After thorough analysis of both sides of the argument, I concede that Nagel’s argument needs refinement before it can be accepted. I take special care when I use the word refinement because I do believe Nagel has made a strong case for the existence of moral luck. Whether we can derive moral judgments from moral luck is where I disagree. This relationship must be explicitly defined before we can start making claims about how luck ought to weigh into moral assessment.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is the capacity in which things that are not under your control can affect the amount of moral responsibility that you face? For this topic, there are generally three main views that claim to answer this question, and they are each rather simple; first, there are those that think that people are only blameworthy for things that are under their control. Second, there are those who think that people are blameworthy for things that are not under their control, and lastly, there are those that restrict the second view, such that they can compromise between both views. In this paper, I will discuss the first two views only, providing arguments for the second view as well as possible counterarguments from those that think the first view is correct.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When most people hear the term “moral saint,” they think of the common “goody-good” or a “perfect child”. As defined by Susan Wolf in her essay “Moral Saints”, a moral saint is a person whose happiness “lie[s] in the happiness of others, and so he would devote himself to others gladly, and with a whole and open heart”. Although this may seem like a normal and amiable trait, the entire meaning is to consume oneself in the advancement of others out of pure altruism while simultaneously to ignore the improvement of oneself and to forgo enjoyment of all forms. Moral saints put others first in all aspects of life and their sole purpose in life is to serve others. They do not attempt to improve their own lives or to indulge in any form of recreation,…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You can do nothing about it. You, on the other hand, will be unlucky, but you can do nothing about that either. Each man finds his way already marked out for him and he can change nothing of it" (Niane 15). God sets man on specific paths; His motivations are a mystery. Mankind, in the face of the mightiness of God, is inferior.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a morally good person will bring you happiness because you are practicing ideals that are believed to be something that will bring you happiness and content within your life, because it is the proper thing to…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People don’t have an understanding of why natural disasters and disease occur and end up blaming God. God can’t do away with all the badness is the world because we are sinned and unperfect. No one can have the justice over someone else. “My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust?…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At a young age majority of us grew up believing that there is a higher being above us that created us, that shaped our lives to be where it is now, and that being is known as god. When we were a child, we did not have a choice whether we truly believed in the existence of God. We were told what to believe and never questioned it that belief. In this essay, I will analyze the existence of god between “Does God Exist?” by Ernest Nagel and “Why God Allows Evil” by Richard Swinburne. Although Nagel rejects the existence of God, he establishes two causes for why God exists.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    From the moment we exit the womb we have no choice to what happens next. Some individuals don’t choose to grow up in a home with an abusive parent or with a mother who was addicted to heroin while she was pregnant indirectly setting you up to be consumed with drugs. We cannot be held accountable for the way we are and in turn can’t be held morally responsible for our actions. Some might aruge if we cannot be held morally accountable for our actions then why are indiduals rewarded and punishmented for their actions. Consider the act of punishing or praising ones action as simply a reactive attitude or feeling towards that action.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Nagel is a New York University professor and has written many things regarding the mind and moral theory. In moral luck Nagel thinks through the whole Kantian view of morality which shows that everyone is equal participants in the moral enterprise. Nagel argues that the Kantian view is too simple and doesn’t take into account the way external factors impinge upon us. Nagel brings up four different types of moral luck: constitutional luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck which means consequences retrospectively justifies an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise more act), and consequential luck which the consequences affect the type or quality of blame or remorse (or moral praise). Having luck, whether it be good or bad, should impact how a person should act towards things.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good people sometimes make bad decisions. They mess up and they let others down. But that doesn’t make them bad people. We all make mistakes.~Unknown When Ponyboy Curtis thinks of Dallas Winston (Dally) from S.E. Hinton’s The Outsiders he thinks of a hoodlum on the streets.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, I would agree with the virtue ethicists more because a good person would obviously possess a good character. In order to be truly good, a person must live a good life by adhering to their personal values and values that are commonly known to be virtues. When determining who is good and who is not good, you without a doubt, have to look at that person’s character. A person with good values is in turn, a good person and a person with bad values is, in a bad…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrift in a Moral Sea Life often throws people some difficult challenges where there ends up being more than one right course of action. Everyone has their own different morals that they have acquired through out their life and this helps them decide which ethical perspective that they believe in. One instance, of where you can look at multiple ethical perspectives to solve a problem comes from the essay “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garrett Harden, which is about being shipwrecked in the middle of the ocean and having to choose who you want to let on the boat. There are 50 people who are on the boat and there is room for only 10 more people, while there are 100 people who are stranded in the water outside of the boat. There are various theories…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The argument from evil, supposes that because there is evil in the world, God therefore cannot be omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. These characteristics are used to describe the essence of the God of Christianity, so according to the argument from evil, God does not exist. Because if He did exist as an all-powerful, loving being, He would not allow such evil to prevail. So, does the fact of evil make it irrational to believe in God? No, the fact of evil does not make it irrational to believe in God.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reality of “stable natural laws” and the human environment such laws facilitate is that they are conducive to free-willed creatures making real moral choices (Morris 274). People find themselves challenged daily to make decisions that impact their value system. Consequently, individuals have the opportunity to grow and learn from the choices and mistakes they make through their life experience. If God is love and loves humankind, then it would stand to reason that He desires for them to reach the place for which they were designed because He would want them to be “fulfilled and their happiness attained” (Lewis…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Nagel is an American philosopher who is currently a philosophy professor at New York University. In his essay, published in 1976, Nagel indicates that the problem of moral luck arises from a clash between our application and intuition most people share about morality. He states the intuition as, “Prior to reflection it is intuitively plausible that people cannot be morally assessed for what is not their fault, or for what is due to factors beyond their control” (Nagel 138). Nagel then goes on to give a definition of moral luck. He says, “Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck” (Statman 59).…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays