Nagel And Rawl

Improved Essays
In Nagel’s claim we understand that moral obligation will not only support the poor, but also the action of coercion established by domestic institutions shapes our societies. Also, Nagel agrees with Rawls’ claim if perhaps there can be something that might be called justice or injustice in the relations between states. Nagel concedes with Rawls’ argument that liberal requirements of justice include a strong component of equality among citizens, but that this is a specifically political demand, which applies to the basic structure of a unified nation-state.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Principles of Justice vs. Utlitarianism Justice is a social concept that is used as an assessment tool in various social institutions such as government, courts, economic systems and education. John Rawls proposed two principles of justice that will help govern in the creation of social and political practices that are fair to all (p. 52): • Rawls’ first principle of justice states that “each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others (p. 53).” • The second principle: “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both a) reasonably expected to be everyone’s advantage, and b) attached to positions and offices open to all”.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sandel presents democracy’s discontent as a product of liberal theory. In his preface, Sandel highlights “the gap between our ideals and institutions” (x).…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critically review the arguments of Florini and Nussbaum: Nussbaum (2001) explains that the social contract theory dominates the western political philosophy and this theory considers the principles of justice as the result of contract, the people make. People make this contract for mutual benefit and live according to the rule of law.. Her main focus is on John Rawls ' work on contractual theory. Nussbaum admits that such theories have some strength in terms of global justice but these theories suffer from some structural defects and can produce imperfect results. According to John Rawl(1971), if resources are scarce and all the contractors or parties involved are equal in power, they are bound to cooperate to achieve their respective goals.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Moral Standing of States,” Walzer responds to the objections of four critics who developed similar arguments against his book, Just and Unjust Wars. They accuse him of promoting statist ideas and remaining unbothered by the lack of rights of the individual, but Walzer insists that his concern lies with the community which stands behind the state. His harsh and conservative stance on terrorism caused an uproar with those who oppose him, but in this writing he suggests that his book may have instead been “too permissive.” Throughout “The Moral Standing of States,” Walzer stands strongly by his proposals and clarifies some of his arguments, but even so, this passage most likely left his critics and their subsequent judgments unfazed because he fails to back down on any…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rawls looks at what the proper role of government should be and he begins with the idea that there are primary goods, which include both material goods and goods of rights or opportunities. It is societies job to figure out how to help us cooperate to distribute those goods in a just way. Rawls does not claim that those goods must be distributed equally, unlike Marx, Rawls is advocating for a welfare state not a communist state. Rawls separates the distribution of material goods and rights, and determines that there are certain rights that must be…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By comparing utilitarian and libertarian views, Sandel is able to sift out the negative aspects of these forms of government that hinder justice. Kant’s, Rawl’s, and Aristotle’s ideas allow its citizens what makes a good…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A free society necessitates the preservation of rights while still granting individuals within the society the freedom to do as they please - as long as their behaviors do not infringe on the rights of others. In free societies, inequality is inevitable. As a result, a governing body may be employed to monitor the scale of inequality and deliberate what must be done to combat major issues that hamper the progress of a nation. On one side of the spectrum, where John Rawls stands, individuals argue that some sort of government intervention is necessary to promote equality so a nation can reach the height of progress. On the other side of the political spectrum, where Robert Nozick stands, people view government intervention as a hindrance to…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, one of the main features of modern liberalism represented by Rawls - is the desire to justify philosophically liberal principles without relying on utilitarian ethics and assuming a neutral state. To justify his concept of liberalism, Rawls considers it necessary to return to the theory of the social contract. But in contrast to the classical version of the theory Rawls revises the concept of the social contract: for it is not an agreement about the subordination of society or the…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work, Theory of Justice, John Rawls describes two principles in which he describes his theory for distributive justice. Rawls interprets the goods described in distributive justice as the power and wealth that stem from institutional positions. The first principle asserts that, “each individual has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with like liberty for all”. (503)…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will elaborate on why our government should be a welfare state. A role of the government should include protecting those who have the least advantage in society. On the other hand, John Rawls’ criticizes the welfare state. The intuitive general conception of justice argument is proposed by Rawls which promotes equal division of social primary goods, such as power or wealth, among people unless the unequal portion is beneficial to the marginalized. Rawls’ discusses the concept of fair equality of opportunities and how an individual’s circumstances shouldn’t have an effect on the social positions available to him or her.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ‘A theory of Justice’ John Rawls attempts to establish a set of principles to which the institutions of society can be built upon and a method through which primary goods can be distributed equally, Rawls names these principles ‘justice as fairness’. Rawls argues that society is a shared agreement between all parties to ensure society remains equal and free. In order to determine what terms of social cooperation would ensure a free and equal society Rawls appeals to a form of ‘social contract’ theory in which there is a hypothetical original scenario in which all rational parties would agree to a set of conditions and terms that would form a just society, this is referred to as the argument from ‘the original position’ and is an integral…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, Rawls published his first major piece of work “A Theory of Justice”. “ … Arguing that choices of principle concerning the basic structure of society should…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays