The article then carries on to have four paragraphs of what the EFF is doing to fight this blatant abuse of the constitution. However, there are some issues with this website that must be noted. This website has absolutely no information on the owner of the website, any of its blog authors, not even the website provider. None of their articles use sources, dates or any kind of peer review system. This source is only useful to see the opinion of people opposing NSA …show more content…
One of the reasons I noticed this website was its use of a ‘clickbait title’, otherwise known as a title that begins with a catchphrase or certain words that catch somebody’s attention. This does not detract from the credibility of the website itself, for most news websites have to get views to get money on what they write, and if they write a title as interesting as “5 Reasons Why The NSA's Massive Surveillance Program Is No Big Deal (And 2 Reasons It Is)” (Business Insider) it is easy to see that the article is interesting and fairly short. Something to note about this article is that it actually has an author, which was very rare in my search of websites for this topic. The article has plenty of cited material in it, is unbiased in its view, making it a website I would use to write a research paper on. When moving to the home page of Business Insider, the website is minimalistic with only the top articles and the current stock prices present on its main