Does the Queens Supreme Court lack personal jurisdiction over NEPTA? More specifically, Can the Queens Supreme court exercise under New York state law it’s long-arm statute to gain personal jurisdiction over NEPTA, a non-resident, for their alleged cause of injury of Taneka due to their alleged negligence?
According to Section 302 of New York Consolidated Laws, Civil Practice Law, and Rules (CPLR 302), if NEPTA “transacts any business within the state” the New York court long-arm statute can be applied. Additionally, personal jurisdiction for New York over the case can be applied if NEPTA “contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” of New York. Moreover, in CPLR 302 part three NEPTA would have to commit “a tortious act
According to Section 302 of New York Consolidated Laws, Civil Practice Law, and Rules (CPLR 302), if NEPTA “transacts any business within the state” the New York court long-arm statute can be applied. Additionally, personal jurisdiction for New York over the case can be applied if NEPTA “contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state” of New York. Moreover, in CPLR 302 part three NEPTA would have to commit “a tortious act