Rather the article gives precise numbers and formulas on how they calculated their work so we as an audience do not believe that E. Woodrow Eckard is giving us false information. Mr. Eckard is very thorough with is information and he gives people the idea that his evidence is more accurate than the biased NCAA evidence and statistics. In my opinion the author makes a good effort to challenge the NCAA and the audience with the evidence and information he brought to the table. The overall article in my opinion was very hard to read, because the author put very detailed formulas and ways he came up with those formulas that was really boring. Half of the article was the author explaining how he got these formulas and what he was going to apply it to and how. Over all the article is very informative and it does show that the NCAA will try to give misleading statistics so their record will look better.
Rather the article gives precise numbers and formulas on how they calculated their work so we as an audience do not believe that E. Woodrow Eckard is giving us false information. Mr. Eckard is very thorough with is information and he gives people the idea that his evidence is more accurate than the biased NCAA evidence and statistics. In my opinion the author makes a good effort to challenge the NCAA and the audience with the evidence and information he brought to the table. The overall article in my opinion was very hard to read, because the author put very detailed formulas and ways he came up with those formulas that was really boring. Half of the article was the author explaining how he got these formulas and what he was going to apply it to and how. Over all the article is very informative and it does show that the NCAA will try to give misleading statistics so their record will look better.