People have been fascinated with the stars ever since the beginning of time. Our first manned mission to the moon was Apollo 11. It was a highlighted moment in history when the impossible was accomplished. Now our mission is to find a planet that supports life. NASA thinks Mars can do this. This will not happen for decades unless NASA gets more funding. While space exploration creates pollution, more funding from the government would greatly improve NASA's progression in space exploration because it would create jobs, make a backup plan for the human race and exploring other planets could open an opportunity of vast amounts of resources to the human race.
One of the main reasons that NASA should have more funding is if human life dies off on …show more content…
Michael McBrien from Northwestern education says, “Many of the devices we use every day require these satellites to operate, including cell phones, GPS systems, satellite television, and weather satellites. They all rely on advances NASA made years ago. In the past, it was not known that NASA would contribute so much to society, so how can one claim that NASA will not provide even more advances in the science and technology fields that will greatly alter the economy for the better”(McBrien). We use satellites every day and if NASA had more funding they could invent more things that we use every day. Some could possibly comment that we don’t need any more inventions because our lives are good how they are. This could be true except for the fact that satellites were thought to be unneeded when they were invented, but now the human race cannot live without them. If NASA had more funding it could be possible that they learn how to do something impossible like teleportation or even new ways to create energy if they could find an energy source that they can bring back through the atmosphere. There are millions of things NASA could do the average human and we need to acknowledge
One of the main reasons that NASA should have more funding is if human life dies off on …show more content…
Michael McBrien from Northwestern education says, “Many of the devices we use every day require these satellites to operate, including cell phones, GPS systems, satellite television, and weather satellites. They all rely on advances NASA made years ago. In the past, it was not known that NASA would contribute so much to society, so how can one claim that NASA will not provide even more advances in the science and technology fields that will greatly alter the economy for the better”(McBrien). We use satellites every day and if NASA had more funding they could invent more things that we use every day. Some could possibly comment that we don’t need any more inventions because our lives are good how they are. This could be true except for the fact that satellites were thought to be unneeded when they were invented, but now the human race cannot live without them. If NASA had more funding it could be possible that they learn how to do something impossible like teleportation or even new ways to create energy if they could find an energy source that they can bring back through the atmosphere. There are millions of things NASA could do the average human and we need to acknowledge