Module 3 Module 1 Analysis

My initial thoughts on my discussions when I read them is that I had quite a few misspelled words. Some of the art pieces we analyzed and discussed were a little more difficult to understand and it is blatantly obvious in my discussions. A lot of them are shorter than others. For example, Module 2: Introduction to Flanders seemed to be shorter in length than any other of my other discussions up until that point. I struggled to find the words to analyze Giovanni Arnolfini and his Bride. My discussions before this one consisted of nearly 200 words and my discussion for this particular analyzation of this piece barley had 100 words. Another one of these discussions I struggled to make 100 words for was Module 2: From Flanders to Florence. I think Module 2 itself caught me off guard. Other discussions I had no problem responding to include; both of Module 1 discussions and all of the Module 4 discussions. My comments have been vague so far, but I feel like everyone’s comments are. Although they are mostly vague, they seem to have gotten longer for some discussions. I think my interest in some of the topics reflected the comments. I hardly ever asked any questions to keep a conversation going. I simply stated my opinion of the comment and kept going. My understanding of the art work progressed throughout the discussions. I actually became more interested in learning about these art pieces. During the first few modules, I felt like I always did the discussions and responded in a hurry, hence the misspelled words. Now I take my time and actually think about what I am writing. I hardly have any misspelled words on the discussions after Module 3. On one of the comments in Module 1: Early Renaissance, I did not even address the person I was responding to. I feel that I became more opinionated throughout these discussions. At first, I agreed with the person I commented to, but I began disagreeing with some people. It is apparent that my interest in Art History has peaked. …show more content…
If I’m being completely honest, as I went back and reread my actual posts, some of them do not make any sense and it is no secret that the posts were rushed and not thought through clearly. I think it is obvious that I was most interested in Module 4: The High Renaissance. I seriously had too many words to discuss the Mona Lisa. My post was detailed and my comments were as well. As I go back and read the comments that were left to my post, I see that most people agreed with what I said and thought it was a great post overall. Another thing I noticed that displayed my interest in all of the discussions in Module 4 is the date I posted them. Usually, I would post my discussion on the day it was due, but with Module 4 I posted a few days earlier. Even though my interest overall has improved, I still do not notice some of the small details that other people notice. As I am reading many of my comments, they consist of things that I failed to notice. In Module 5, I feel that I resorted to my old ways. My comments and discussion was not thought at as well and this discussion did not reflect my improvement and interest over the semester. Overall, I think I have improved since I began the class and it shows in discussions and my comments. I feel that I contributed to the online learning community efficiently. I do not