The introduction to my speech started with an attempt to connect the audience with my topic. However, I felt like this attempt did not effectively invest the audience. In addition, the introduction was shorter than I estimated; this was partly due to my delivery, but the length also …show more content…
Although the structure of my speech was well-developed and delivered, my first argument about free will was difficult to convey and turned out unclear. If I had practiced expressing that argument, it would have been smoother. In addition, I used the word “again” several times. The use of “again” illustrates that I was too repetitive in my speech. Furthermore, I had too much information in my justifications that did not specially pertain to my solution. More review and careful consideration would do wonders for my …show more content…
However, orally citing the sources was difficult and I often struggled with transitioning for the citation into the source’s argument. The content of the sources was well-grounded in my arguments and further proved my solution. Memorizing the names of the authors could help the flow of my speech.
My movement throughout my speech was well-done. Instead of remaining simply behind the podium, I was able to walk around the room and command the audience’s attention through my movements. I made eye contact with the audience when appropriate. In addition, I used my hands to emphasize the arguments that I was making. At times, however, I would forget my train of thought and was not able to simply glance down at my outline because it was back at the podium. Taking the outline with me could assist me.
The time of my speech turned out to be around seven minutes long, meaning I had about a minute more to finish up my speech. I could have used that extra minute if I had slowed down my arguments earlier on in the speech. The positive aspect is that I had it within the time frame. In the future, my practice and a clearer outline will assist me in forming a more professional