Essay On Kantian Ethics

Superior Essays
Personal ethics are unique to each and every person and they are developed in many different ways caused by many different types of events. Some people’s are developed by the way they are raised. They gather bits and pieces from parents, older siblings, grandparents, and even some teachers. They can then be strengthened or changed by life experiences. Your ethics are also heavily built based on your personality and how you want to live your life. Inside your personal ethics there are also your limitations. What do you refuse to even consider or fail to understand. People also change their ethics and personality to fit social norms. This discusses my personal code of ethics, how they formed and how it compares to well established ethical codes. …show more content…
In Kantian ethics things are considered right or wrong in a black and white scale. Unlike mine which deals with many shades of grey. My ethical system has room for allowances that can help people, even if those people are only people very close to me. Utilitarian ethics is a much closer match to my personal ethics. This is due to the fact that it allows both logical reasoning of consequences and the flexibility to do what is required. However, there are also so major differences such as Utilitarian ethics focusing on the benefit to all people where mine is focused on the benefit of me and my close friends. This strictly violates Utilitarian ethics as it defies the greater good, which is supposed to benefit the majority of society. Social Contract theory is close to my personal ethics do to the limitations I place on myself. I limit myself to only legal actions do to not wanting people to bother me or be inconvenienced. One thing my personal ethics do not agree on with social contract is things that while not illegal would be against the social contract, I see no problem with as long as it advances my

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The main thing that we have to consider in our mind is that, every person has a personal code of ethics, which is shaped by values and attitudes. We develop our personal code of ethics…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I would like to believe that I learned my personal ethics from my family more importantly my parents. Growing up my parents thought me many things that had several messages attached to them. Those messages I now use on a daily basis most importantly in my career. One of the ethics that I could remember is to be caring and loyal friend, neighbor, family, or co-worker. Having these two ethicses has guided me to the field of psychology and is still helping me.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A moral issue has no concrete definition, but can be interpreted as what is right and wrong in terms of moral behavior, not a matter of preference. I have used this definition in order to determine the moral issues regarding obtaining the senior final exam answers. Immediately, I ought to contact the administration of the SFE, inform them I have accidentally received answers, thus compromising the exam. The sooner I let them know, the sooner they can find out why I was sent the answers in the first place, and perhaps create a new exam. I ought to keep this information between the administration and myself.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s ethics is all about good will and following your duties. He believes that we need to have the right motives and if we do, then it is good. For example, we should be loyal to people, but if you are being loyal to an evil person, then that is not good. If you are being loyal to a good person, someone who has a goodwill then that is following your duty. Having a goodwill is unique in that the fact that is is always deemed moral and right, even if it fails to achieve its intentions.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant's Duty Ethics

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The term ethical engineering is problematic and faced by many professional engineers today. Questions, such as, “What should I do?”, “Is this morally correct?”, “Am I going to be responsible for these actions?”, etc. arise in many occasions. Volkswagen engineer, James Liang, was faced with these questions when he developed a device to “cheat” the national United States emissions tests, therefore making it seem that the Volkswagen was reputable, and it could be noted as a “clean diesel” vehicle (Volkswagen). Through research, James Liang’s actions are being investigated, and it will be determined if he took responsibility for his actions, responsibility for disclosure, if his actions were justified morally with federal regulations, if he was loyal to his company, and if he served the society in a responsible as well as an ethical manner.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now let’s apply Utilitarianism to L’s case. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. This means that what matters when deciding if an act was good or bad are the consequences of said action. With Utilitarianism, whatever action maximizes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people is the right action (Tait, pg.10). The Philosopher Gilbert Harmon describes Utilitarianism as such, “ You ought always to act so as to maximize the social utility where social utility is simply another name for the general welfare,” (Harmon, pg. 152).…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within philosophy, there exists many ethical perspectives that seek to justify moral or good actions from immoral or bad actions. But what truly makes something ethically permissible? Similar to many topics in philosophy, this question cannot be met with a simple answer, but instead, it should be explored through the unique perspectives of a multitude of different philosophers. Because a multitude of differing yet acceptable answers exist to the question, “what is the ethical or moral choice in this situation?” philosophers such as Immanuel Kant and J.S. Mill have taken the forefront with radically different yet illuminating ideals on the ethical permissibility of our actions.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION The ethical decision is challenging and probably blurry for decision-makers. Mostly, it creates a dilemma where fierce antagonism arises from listening to the voice of conscience and the voices of other opinions surrounding. Profoundly, the winner is determined by how willing the person to pursue the goodness and choose freely to pay attention to the inner voice or mute it. Moral philosophers are contributing in providing an instrument to enable us to heed to the verdict of conscience, by which will be the compass through the decision stages.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    this is one of the most popular ethical theories in the XIX century, which was “used to explain the importance to get the maximum benefit considering the greater number of individuals, as a result, the happiness of each person depends on the other (pilosophy glosary).” So wherever action moral right or wrong has one consequence and that consequence is indifferent if the benefit is for example a ten people with wherever action and hurt one person, or if the situation produces more good things than bad this is basically the view point from John Stuart Mill discovered the utilitarianism. The utilitarianism can be applied in business when you are making decisions for you company, so, this theory looks for maximizing the good effects and minimizing the bad results of the company, that is why the utilitarianism thinks that Anything is acceptable if it leads to a successful result, so, the end justifies the means.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Specifically, rule utilitarianism brings about the idea that one should act according to a set of rules that would lead to the most optimal consequences and is deemed by a majority to be acceptable. In contrary, Kant believed that one’s actions should be based on the purity of the will and not based on consequences at…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is an area of knowledge that justifies what is wrong and right, it considers the moral obligations behind our behaviour and actions. A well-known theory in the fields of Ethics is utilitarianism which argues “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill 10). Good actions are actions that promote happiness, and if the amount of happiness caused by an action is greater than the amount lost, the action is good. My personal knowledge of moral obligations is not affected by utilitarianism as I do not consider the outcome of happiness. Similarly, personal knowledge does not always shape shared knowledge as my moral obligations cannot shape shared moral obligations.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics is often a difficult subject to get a clear understanding of. In order to begin to understand Ethics, one must understand that their isn’t just one concept of what is ethical for everyone in the world, which is the critical aspect of Ethics. Different culture, beliefs, and societies define what Ethics is to them. My personal understanding of Ethics was always fairly basic. It was very plainly “what ever the right thing to do” is.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays