My Holland Code Analysis

1. The online assessments were rather accurate. They all had results that matched well with each other; they all consistently implied artistic, social, and methodical personality traits, which line up with known personality traits. One reason for any possible false results may to due to the assessments requiring a lot of self-honesty, which could be alter by social standards. For example, an introvert may make their answers more extrovert as society considers extroverts to be leaders, and introverts to be loners. The assessments focused on aspects, and did not give a single answer; instead, they normally provided the users percentages, which helped in provided an overall view on the results, thus improving the overall accuracy. However, I found …show more content…
My Holland Code results showed that my personality had high social, artistic, and investigative aspects, while having low conventional, realistic, and enterprising aspects. Performing this assessment first allowed for a general line of comparison for other assessments.
The work values quiz shows interest in public, indoor work with high intellectual stimuli, competition, and methodical work; as well as having aspects that involved helping others. My multiple intelligence results showed that I have high intrapersonal, verbal, and visual intelligences, which corresponds with the results of the Holland Code assessments, specifically the high artistic aspect.
The work preference quiz displayed a very high need for social environments, above average methodical and innovative environments, which reflects on the Holland Code once again, as well as the multiple intelligences quiz results.
My Data, people and things quiz had results for copying, nurturing and precision work, though those were directly chosen by me, so they may not be completely accurate.
The Abilities quiz showed that I have a high spatial perception and finger dexterity, which corresponds with my hobbies (Sculpting, drawing and painting) and an above average verbal ability as well, which is one of my main learning methods. I also displayed above average form perception, general learning ability and manual …show more content…
Both Chiropractor and dental hygienist were both recommended occupations from the online assessments results. Both have been occupations that have interested me previously. I do plan to become a dental assistant and than possibly return to school for dental hygiene. The results of the assessments reinforce the career ideas that I have had. As I would like to focus on a scientific career that involves interacting with the public and helping people.
4. I believe these careers would match my personality very well and I had high investigative, social, and artistic results in the Holland theory assessment; all of which are need to be successful in both chiropractor and dental hygienist career paths as one needs explorative, creative, and supportive personality traits. They seem to both have high amounts of satisfaction in the areas I am concerned with (Helping overs, money, regular schedules, and area to further specialties).
5. The results highly reinforced my career choices, as I have already decided to go in a path, which involves healthcare, specifically a career in dental assistance and later on dental hygienist if it suits me. Most my career recommendations regarded support and healthcare; which was highly motivating and rather expected, as I have always had a very high interest regarding those career paths (Nursing, paleontology, police, social worker, chiropractor, and dental