Conflict 330
Peer Review of Performance in Group Work
Mackenzie
Contributions: 4
Preparedness: 4
Approach to working with others: 4
Quality of work: 4
Additional notes:
Mac was attentive and actively engaged with the group. Even though she missed the class before we presented, she made great effort to inquire about how the first group did and what we can do to do better. She organized the entire brief document checking to make sure we completed the assignment thoroughly. In addition, identified the power dynamic within the conflict and broke down each type of power both Margaret and Mary were employing. She played her character, Susan, true to life.
Allie
Contributions: 4
Preparedness: 4
Approach to working with others: 4
Quality of …show more content…
We lost a member due to personal circumstances so that left us with four people. We thought it might be easier with less people. The initial meeting with our group in class was interesting. The personalities were strong and people were clashing about what conflict we should do for our skit. Ben and I butt heads a few times, because he really wanted to do his specific conflict. Everyone looked towards me for the final verdict, and I respectfully said no, we could not do his conflict. That was the only major altercation that happened within the group. There was a power dynamic of girls versus the one boy in the group. The girls had a tendency to agree with each other. Ben did not say much but when he did, we did not attack him. I feel like we all took his comments into considerations, but some of his ideas could not positively contribute to the …show more content…
This meeting was very productive. Each person asked me for greater detail about their character. We rehearsed the skit about five times. Ben offered some great suggestions on how we could make the setting and the relationships between characters more clear, which we implemented without hesitation. During the skit, everyone stayed true to character. We all remembered to say those crucial lines that really defined the dynamics within the conflict. The presentation was executed as planned with each member contributing equally. Every group member gave a well-articulated explanation of each conflict dynamic with viable examples from the skit.
Overall, our group vibed well together. There was only one major altercation. I felt stressed out as this was our final project for the class. Everyone eventually contributed a great deal after I did some pushing and prodding to get the process rolling. We could have functioned more effectively if we began the project earlier. It would have eliminated a lot of stress for me at
Peer Review of Performance in Group Work
Mackenzie
Contributions: 4
Preparedness: 4
Approach to working with others: 4
Quality of work: 4
Additional notes:
Mac was attentive and actively engaged with the group. Even though she missed the class before we presented, she made great effort to inquire about how the first group did and what we can do to do better. She organized the entire brief document checking to make sure we completed the assignment thoroughly. In addition, identified the power dynamic within the conflict and broke down each type of power both Margaret and Mary were employing. She played her character, Susan, true to life.
Allie
Contributions: 4
Preparedness: 4
Approach to working with others: 4
Quality of …show more content…
We lost a member due to personal circumstances so that left us with four people. We thought it might be easier with less people. The initial meeting with our group in class was interesting. The personalities were strong and people were clashing about what conflict we should do for our skit. Ben and I butt heads a few times, because he really wanted to do his specific conflict. Everyone looked towards me for the final verdict, and I respectfully said no, we could not do his conflict. That was the only major altercation that happened within the group. There was a power dynamic of girls versus the one boy in the group. The girls had a tendency to agree with each other. Ben did not say much but when he did, we did not attack him. I feel like we all took his comments into considerations, but some of his ideas could not positively contribute to the …show more content…
This meeting was very productive. Each person asked me for greater detail about their character. We rehearsed the skit about five times. Ben offered some great suggestions on how we could make the setting and the relationships between characters more clear, which we implemented without hesitation. During the skit, everyone stayed true to character. We all remembered to say those crucial lines that really defined the dynamics within the conflict. The presentation was executed as planned with each member contributing equally. Every group member gave a well-articulated explanation of each conflict dynamic with viable examples from the skit.
Overall, our group vibed well together. There was only one major altercation. I felt stressed out as this was our final project for the class. Everyone eventually contributed a great deal after I did some pushing and prodding to get the process rolling. We could have functioned more effectively if we began the project earlier. It would have eliminated a lot of stress for me at