Solipsism Vs Reality

Improved Essays
Throughout my life, my thoughts and beliefs about the world have changed drastically as I’ve encountered strange scenarios within the world. Of all my beliefs, the one that may be the strangest is one that is similar to what solipsists believe, but I feel it is more in line with relativity. The core of solipsism is that only the self and mind can be to be true while the outside world does not exist. While my belief may seem to be very similar to this, it differs in numerous important aspects. My belief revolves around the idea that our reality is dependent upon our perception of it. This being true, it would signify that we all live in our own reality according to how our mind built it. Of course, with the application and invention of tools …show more content…
This is owing to the fact that no matter how well we believe we understand the universe, although now we are aware we barely know anything, there is always a chance that our current theories are incorrect in representing an objective reality. One recognized example of this is Newtonian Mechanics. Although Newton’s equations and laws hold true for most scenarios that we utilize them today, they are not a true representation of how the universe works. We are familiar with this since Einstein came and presented his theory of relativity, or more so his own expansion on an already existing theory of electrical relativity. The equations that Einstein created for his theory will work in all the situations that Newton’s equations will along with countless other scenarios that generally involve speeds approaching the speed of light. For hundreds of years, Newtonian Mechanics were the generally accepted laws of the universe. This is simple to understand since the only times when Newtonian Mechanics failed were under extreme situations where time and space were warped. These scenarios are unknown to the multitudes today and during Newton’s reign even fewer knew of them. And during that time many perceived the world to be dictated by Newtonian Mechanics, which is arguably correct in a sense that on the scale Newton’s equations will work. But they do not accurately represent an objective reality. This indicates …show more content…
The search for an objective theory of everything will continue as long as humans exhibit any amount of curiosity towards the workings of the universe. Ultimately there will be no way to achieve such a theory as it will need to be tested and work for every possible situation which is impossible to do considering how little we in truth know about the universe and what occurs within it. This essentially inhibits the perception of any objective reality by humans. Which subsequently comes to the question of whether or not there is such thing as an objective reality. This is a difficult question taking into account that there is no real proof of an objective reality only data and theories that point to the possibility of its existence. I do believe there is an objective reality for the reason that our theories seem to be getting increasingly accurate towards something. However, seeing as perception of said objective reality is doomed, our own realities will continue to diverge at certain points which will continue to create conflict between

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    We are always in the process of constructing our own reality. It's subject to reconstruction and it allows for change. There's no universal truth, it's a matter of interpretation. These researchers are looking to uncover rules not laws. An individuals view is to do with a subject and they embrace the subjective.…

    • 3706 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Worldview

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyone have a perspective on how they observe the world. My opinion is that worldview is a collection of observations that is commonly used as a way to configure judgement, understanding, knowledge and different findings of truth. Worldview is a set of beliefs that an individual has within them to value everyday life choices such as religion, history, diversity, values, God, humanity and many more. An individual’s feelings, emotions, and experiences can strongly impact their worldview. (105 words) Question of Origin…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We may agree on some things but that does not mean we see it the same way. Therefore, I believe we all have our own understanding of what reality is. In the article “Is our Universe Fake?” Lawrence talks about the three types of reality.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In their 1985 work The Dialectical Biologist, authors Levins and Lewontin make the case for a dialectical-perspective-based approach to scientific inquiry and interpretation. Here we first summarize what is more rigorously referred to as the dialectical materialist (DM) perspective (Clark & York, 2005), then illustrate how science and social epidemiology (SE) fits within the framework developed therein. Next, we compare our own application of the dialectic framework to SE to the approach laid out in the authors’ own discussion on SE in Chapter 12, Research Needs for Latin Community Health. The purpose of the latter analysis is multifold: first, we aim to examine what might be gained by seeking a more holistic approach in the field; second,…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result, reality, perhaps, does not exist, and one can never know if one exists or…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Principle of Indeterminacy turned science inside out. Suddenly determinism goes, causality goes, and we are left with a universe composed of what Eddington calls, ‘mind-stuff.’ Listen to these physicists: Sir James Jeans, Eddington's successor, invokes ‘fate,’ saying that the future "may rest on the knees of whatever gods there be." Three world-famous physicians to demonstrate the dramatic effect the Principle of Indeterminacy had on those people who were intelligent enough to follow its logic. Eddington said the world was composed of "'mind stuff '" and that we now have “'no clear distinction between the Natural and the Supernatural'”; Sir James Jeans "invokes 'fate, I saying that the future 'may rest on the knees of whatever gods there…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grendel Solipsism Essay

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One literary theory I observed throughout chapter 2 of Grendel is solipsism. The definition of solipsism is a theory that an individual will recognize that he himself is the only truth to the reality. One example of Gardner’s use of Solipsism is when he explains that on page 17, “We were one thing, like the wall and the rock growing out from it.” In contrast, he additionally contrast on page 17 with “the smooth span of packed dirt between him and his mother, and the shocking separateness from him in his mother’s eyes” (p.17). This quote clearly exemplifies solipsism as being an isolated state where people only depend on themselves and not others.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Einstein’s work was on the edges, the edge of the universe, and the edge of what our minds can understand and know for certain. One of the goals of this book is to say all we can know and check about the big picture of life. When something involves infinity or immortality, I say as little as possible. It is a waste of time, of life, to think about something that is unknowable. The way to know the unknowable is to know all you can know about what can be known.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. I would place Neil deGrasse Tyson closer to the scientism side of the scientism-creationism spectrum, but still near the middle of the spectrum. DeGrasse Tyson reveals his agnostic perspective when he says he does not believe in an afterlife because there is no evidence. However, he agrees with Larry King when he calls many believers “sincere and wonderful people”, and does not call them delusional. This respect for others’ beliefs even when he does not agree with them can help the relationship between faith and science.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Religious Beliefs

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Personal religious beliefs can be defined as the constitutional protection which is against compulsory immunizations. Accordingly, it can be defined as the reality of the mythological, supernatural or spiritual aspects of a religion. According to, (Gibson, & Randall, 1988), religious belief is distinct from the religious practices with some believer’s not practicing religion as some practitioners not believing religion. There are several forms of religious belief as acknowledged by, (Josephson, & Peteet, 2004), including; universalism which can be explained as the situation where by individuals believes that religion cannot be separated from other aspects of life. Orthodoxy is another form of religious belief which closely follows the edicts,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Spiritual Journey For my paper, I will be covering and exploring scientific theories that are then applied to my personal life experiences to form a sort of hybrid story/academic research paper, which I feel suits perfectly my strong character traits of constant hesitation. I will bring to mention my personal philosophies, past/present dependency problems, acute depression, and individual spiritual experiences which were able to defy my understanding of science, and thus exist without empirical explanation. When I think of one’s reality, I try to see things from every angle, yet admittedly do not, but I am confident many others are trapped in this single-viewed paradox. I am not fond of the terms human nature and the potential assumptions…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy and Literature Final Exam Dr. Charles Nussbaum Submitted By: Srijana Timalsina 1. What is reflective equilibrium? Summarize briefly but accurately the thought experiments posed (respectively) by Thomson and Dennett in their articles. Explain how the experiments are designed to affect our intuitions about specific cases and state the principles that you believe must be brought into reflective equilibrium with these intuitions. What is Martha Nussbaum’s perceptive equilibrium?…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguing with a Condescension to the Realm of Reality: Three of the Ideas from Republic that I Disagree with There are different degrees of arrogance. Some people think they're right, and you're wrong. Others think they're right and you're wrong, so they're better than you. Then, there's a special category for just one man, and his subsequent disciples.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Zimmerman Presentism

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Explain and critically evaluate Zimmerman’s response to relativity-based arguments against presentism. Optional: compare and contrast Zimmerman’s response with Markosian’s response. Zimmerman defends the A-theory of time against allegations of B-theorists that it is in conflict with the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) and the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). He agrees that if there is conflict between the two, then it does indeed cause trouble for the A-theory.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Brilliant Essays