Daniel Pink’s argument about this book is that carrots and sticks don’t work anymore; we have the innate psychological need for autonomy, mastery, and purpose which is Motivation 3.0 .In my academic future I do see motivation 3.0 factoring into my future. Motivation 3.0 is going to factor in my academic future because the psychological need for autonomy, mastery, and purpose is going to take a big toll in my education.
When Pink says, “I’ve seen the future and it works. It works in around-the-clock bursts in Sydney, Australia. It works on guerrilla-style side projects in Mountain View, California. And it works whenever it damn well pleases in Charlottesville, Virginia. The reason why it works is because of how it works.” I picked this from the book because at the beginning of the chapter I was confused. When I finished the chapter I went back and I like how it said. It relates to my academic future because it’s important for me to know how it works. My academic future isn’t just going to happen just like that. I have to work for it and make it work around my time and tell myself how it’s going to work, when it’s going to work. …show more content…
Academically I wouldn’t use this system to get information or to get past something, this would be taking a shortcut. I like to go through the process step by step, I don’t like leaving out a big chunk of information. On the other hand, there is also a good side to carrots and sticks. It can help you increase your creativity or reduce it. Creativity is a big source in my education that is very much needed, without creativity I can’t really choose what you want to go for. “If Britain decided to pay citizens to donate that would actually reduce the country blood