Mussolini And Stalin Similarities

Improved Essays
Throughout history, there have been many powerful leaders who controlled their people in various different ways. Two of these leaders are Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini; they were leaders who ruled different countries during different times, so they were very different in most of their ways, but they were also similar in a few of their ways. In this essay, these two leaders will be compared and contrasted by their political ideologies, the way they treated their citizens, and their goals while they were leading. Stalin and Mussolini had majorly differing political views, and hardly had anything in common in general when it came to politics.. Stalin was always a hardcore communist and his views mostly never changed, and he also followed …show more content…
Unlike Mussolini, Stalin even controlled the country’s agriculture by collective farming. They both controlled the way people thought or tried to alter how they thought, but Stalin did this through the use of propaganda (Esler 545) and Mussolini did it through their education system and used young fascists to persuade others (Esler 539-540). Stalin used his people’s terror against them, but they both killed protestors and critics, or anyone who tried speaking out against them (Esler 544-545). They both believed in a totalitarian state, and they tried controlling everything about the countries. Mussolini had little care for religion in the country, but Stalin was always a hardcore atheist. Violence was strongly encouraged in both countries, but Mussolini highly encouraged it whenever dealing with opposing parties (www.biography.com). Stalin and Mussolini both treated their citizens very similarly and went about how they ruled their country very similarly, although there were a few things they did …show more content…
One of two plans Stalin came up with to improve Germany was the Comintern. The main goal of the Comintern was to overthrow all of the Capitalist governments and establish completely Communist governments throughout the country (Esler 549). The second plan Stalin came up with was the “five-year plan,” which were a series of nationalized plans for the economic development of the Soviet Union. Stalin’s main goals was to increase the output of industrial goods, and he placed emphasis on electrical power, capital goods, and agriculture. Stalin wanted to make the Soviet Union’s economy self-sufficient, as he feared that his nation was falling behind and needed to catch up with the rest of the industrialized world (Esler 542-544). Mussolini's ultimate goal was to bring Italy back to the glory days of the roman empire. Unlike Stalin, he did not care for global domination, he just wanted Italy to be a great country, as it was back in the Roman Empire days (www.history.com). Both leaders, however, did have goals to have complete control over their country and for it to be a totalitarian state; both leaders wanted their country to thrive. Both leaders did have goals to meet for their country, though they were not all similar, and they both worked to accomplish those goals, even though they may have went about it all

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Nazi Germany's undeniable political and military partner in Europe was Italy. The Italians had been administered by a rightist administration under Benito Mussolini since 1925. Italian one party rule was all that much the senior sibling of Nazism, a reality Hitler himself recognized. Yet for all their ideological likenesses, the relationship in the middle of Hitler and Mussolini was uneven and complex. The arrangement of their two nations was thus not as firm the same number of foreseen.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Let us have a dagger between our teeth, a bomb in our hands, and a scorn in our hearts” ~ Benito Mussolini, this shows he is a dark person with hate in his life. People could’ve tried to help him and show him the Central Powers were the best side but he wouldn’t have…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Within the twentieth century, various totalitarian regimes had taken control in countries across the globe. Germany’s Adolf Hitler and Italy’s Benito Mussolini gained power from their country’s political imbalance and financial struggles after WWI and through their citizen’s desperation and wounded nationalism. Germany, in particular, was entirely blamed for WWI and had to carry out the economic consequences by itself because of the Treaty of Versailles. Cuba and Russia’s fascist governments were established through violent means: Fidel Castro launched a coup d'etat in 1959 and Stalin eliminated all of his opposers in order to win through “elections”.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mussolini's Fascist Regime

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It seems that, in that sense, Mussolini did fulfil his dream to emulate Caesar. Leading fascists such as Dino Grandi and Galeazzo Ciano had been planning to depose Mussolini since 1942, however it was the Allied invasion of Sicily that set it into motion, demonstrating the weakness of Italy and the fascist regime. Furthermore, it became apparent that the Allies would not negotiate peace with Mussolini as they regarded him as to impetuous to make any negotiations with and thus, for…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stalin infamously consisted his rule over the Soviet Union through communism, brisk industrialization, propaganda and censorship, and mass killings of anyone who conspired against. Mao, correspondingly, enforced communistic views, quickly sanctioned collectivisation and industrial growth, manipulated his people into complying with his modifications to the law with disinformation, and forming groups to kill resistance to his position of the…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler were unarguably the two most powerful leaders to ever rule Russia and Germany. The pair spread terror across the Europe as they took power and aimed to consolidate it. Stalin was born in Georgia, which was then part of the Russian empire, and was the son of a cobbler. During his time as a student he began reading Marxist literature and it inspired him to devote his time to the revolutionary movement against the Russian monarchy. He would often get arrested and exiled to Siberia during his time as an activist, however when the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917 he rose through the ranks of the party.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In so many ways the two nations were nothing alike but yet many people still consider the two to be the same. Lenin proposed to not oppress mediums of entertainment or sources of literature but instead use them for socialistic gain. Through regulation he could ensure that only party interests were at heart. Later when the Soviet Union took control this regulation or for short propaganda was the most devastating of all soviet weapons. Soviet leaders were able to influence all of the world by connecting with people on a personal level.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stalin was economically different because he had a Five-Year Plan which was to improve transportation, farm output, all businesses that were owned by the government were distributed, and it was also supposed to command economy. The results of this Five-Year Plan were that the “Industry and transportation had high production goals… pushed workers… bonus for success… punishment for failure” (Notes). Stalin faced a problem when civilians were forced into agriculture they did not like the collectables and resisted in various ways. Hitler was different economically since Germany had fallen behind because of the Treaty of Versailles and they had fallen behind on reparation payments they had a weak economy. They printed more money which caused inflation and the US got involved “US helped (to bring) Germany’s inflation under control” (Notes).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, they also have major differences that changed the way that their nations ruled and whether or not their “empires” survived the test of time. In Italy, unlike Germany and Russia, Mussolini preserved capitalism and free-market society. In Germany and Russia, Stalin and Hitler executed millions while Mussolini preferred to terrorize people rather than kill them. In Germany, Hitler kept his military advisors and generals whereas Stalin eliminated almost all of his which made the German invasion of Russia so effortless in World War II. Despite their differences, all three totalitarian governments successfully took advantage of national disarray through evil, terror and brilliance, even if their rule only lasted for a relatively short time.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is an explicit warning to all citizens '’ this contradicts his call for protecting freedom because this suggests that if opposition was shown to the state, then the ‘fundamental freedoms’ Mussolini was previously calling for would be terminated. This was the case for the majority of political opponents who opposed the state. Sonnessa says that local councillors, deputies and prefects from the Socialists and the Communists were most likely subject to Fascist imprisonment. Conversely, it is arguable that this did not mean anything because Mussolini had not made any serious dictatorial moves at least in the short-term: the press was left mostly free, political parties in the National Parliament were allowed to continue to exist and Mussolini also entered…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mao and Stalin were both horrific, but strategic communist leaders. During their time as leaders, they showed other countries who was in control and showed their people the power of communism. China was not ready for anything when Mao came to power. The USSR had their share of suffering, especially after the World Wars. Although Mao and Stalin lived during different times and in different countries, they share similarities in their leadership and policies, they had their differences in how they handled power, and between the two, Mao is by far the worst to date.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both governments have a background of instilling fear in citizens to establish the dictatorship-like leadership present in their nations. Mussolini and the Party both confirm their totalitarianism through their…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terror included the instruments of repression and murder…” (Spielvogel 816), and “because the early indoctrination of [Germany’s] youth would lay the foundation for a strong totalitarian state, youth organizations… were given special attention.” (Spielvogel 816) Hitler and Mussolini both used similar tactics to indoctrinate and control their country, since they both used youth organizations to indoctrinate the young people, and used special groups (squadistri and SS) that utilized violence to keep control in their states. Therefore, because of Hitler’s and Mussolini’s methods of strengthening their parties and controlling their countries, both dictators were more similar than they were…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tactics Of Joseph Stalin

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He used four primary tactics:show trials, purges, censorship, propaganda, and fear and terror to keep a hold onto his extremely powerful state. Before digging deeper into that, Stalin’s five-year plan needs…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrary to Vladimir Lenin, who was quite modest and refused any kind of public praise, Stalin relied on constant worship in what became known as Stalin’s cult of personality. In this sense, Stalin’s personality cult went against traditional Bolshevik practice. This cult allowed Stalin to have a stronger support system for his policies as he lacked the same prestige as Lenin, especially in the 1930s when the famine of 1932-1933 increased opposition and he started to rely on drastic measures such as the Great Purge, in which he eradicated any people he perceived to be a threat to his authority. Thus, Stalin’s cult also grew as his absolute power and dictatorial leadership style also grew in the 1930s. Interestingly, however, Stalin was significantly…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays