Peace Terms with Jerusalem, 636, is an excellent piece show casing a time period where Jerusalem was under Muslim ruler allowed for Christian and Jews to practice their own faith but under Muslims’ regulation. Muslims were a lot more tolerant of other faith being practice than the pervious sovereign power in Jerusalem, the Byzantine Empire. Second source, Travel shows a traveler from Morocco whom eventually becomes an ambassador for Indian when they send them to travel to China for trade. The third source, The pact to Be Accorded to Non-Muslims subjects is a document with tough rules that non Muslims …show more content…
This piece first dialogue to the rules and regulations Christians, in which, Muslims constructed it. So here we can see that even though Muslims are tolerate of Christians, they will pose harsh rules among the Christians. The article furthermore, verbalizes that if a non-muslims commits crimes such as fornication with a Muslim women, marriages a muslims women, or robs a Muslim person then his life is the disposal of the Muslims leaders. At the end of the piece it is clearly stated that people of non-muslims faith must follow by the conditions, which have been imposed. “ You may not display crosses in Muslim cities, nor proclaim polytheism, nor build churches or meeting place for your prayers, nor strike clappers, nor proclaim your polytheistic beliefs on the subject of Jesus on Muslims” (pg.221) Non-muslims had strict rules places upon them and if he disturbs the life of a Muslim then a heavy price is to be paid for