Murphy V. Steeplechase Amusement Co: Case Study

Decent Essays
Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co. Brief
FACTS:
Plaintiff was at amusement park (defendant) with friends. Decided to ride “The Flopper,” fell, and broke a knee. The ride was already in motion when plaintiff entered it. Ride consisted of a moving belt, running on an incline, on which riders could seat or stand. Plaintiff argued that the ride was dangerous and not properly padded to prevent injury.
ISSUE:
Is a defendant liable when danger is reasonably foreseeable?
RULE:
When participating in an inherently dangerous activity, one accepts the obvious and necessary risk.
ANALYSIS:
By entering the ride, the plaintiff assumed the risk inherent in a moving and jerking belt designed to throw its riders off balance. Even though the ride

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case McNabb v. Bay Village Club Condominium Assoc. The plaintiff argues that there was hydraulic oil outside the elevator doors that he did not see. After he fell he saw that the oil was seeping from under the door of a machine next to the elevator. The puddle of oil was about four or five feet wide . Two witnesses said they saw the oil there, and one of the witnesses reported it to the maintenance man.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maussner v Atlantic City Country Club 691 A.2d 826 (1997) Facts of case- The plaintiff (golfer) was playing golf with his friends, but then it started to rain and not just raining but thundering as well. He and his friends were making their way back to the golf course when the plaintiff and his friend got struck by lightning on the defendant’s (golf course owner and operators). The plaintiff and the friend managed to live, but the plaintiff was left with serious injuries. The plaintiff then proceeded to sue the owner of the golf course for negligence because the golf course had no shelters for him to take cover, the safety procedures for thunderstorms were put up after the defendant got struck by lightning as well as there were no devices…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction In this paper, I will discuss the key facts, issues, and court holdings of the Fare v. Michael C. case. Discussion The Fare v. Michael C. case was heard before the United States Supreme Court in 1979, following an appeal referencing the Miranda Warnings issued to the juvenile defendant (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). At the time of the arrest in February 1976 in Van Nuys, California, the suspect, Michael C., was just over sixteen years old (FindLaw, n.d.)…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Honda vs Norman The incident occurred as Karen began with Karen Norman backing up and then she backed into a ramp that made her fall to water. She was not able to get out and drowned. Karen’s parents filled a liability lawsuit against Honda, in which they stated that the seatbelt was defective and was at fault for the death of Norman’s daughter. However, Karen the daughter had been drinking just before the accident.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    To prove negligence in a tort case, Bukowski had to show the four elements of negligence: Standard of care, breach of duty, causation, and injury. Standard of care consists of the sport entity (Clarkson University’s baseball coach) to provide a safe environment for those under their care. Bukowski claimed that the environment he was participating in was not safe for multiple reasons. He claimed the backdrop for the pitcher was multi-colored, which made it difficult to see the ball coming at him.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) COUNTY OF GREENVILLE ) FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) Carl Ameche, ) ) C.A. NO.: 2016-CP-23-999999 Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMPLAINT Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, ) (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) and Maple Meadows Campground, ) ) Defendants.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parties: Ms. Palsgraf Long Island Railroad Co. Two employees Man catching the train carrying the unknown fireworks Issue: How is the duty of care determined for Ms. Palsgraf safety while on the platform of the train station? Does the Long Island Railroad Co. owe that duty to Ms. Palsgraf? Is the Log Island Railroad Co. responsible for the actual and proximate case of Ms. Palsgraf injuries?…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The injuries sustained in the Niles v City of San Rafael were foreseeable. The injuries resulted from the commission and the omission of act from the defendants. There was negligence in the city’s supervision of the school playground and medical malpractice at Mt. Zion Hospital. The medical negligence was nonfeasance meaning there was a failure to act when there is a duty to act as a reasonability to safeguard a person rights. The Plaintiff was an innocent party whom rights were violated by the defendants.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The plaintiff then fell backwards and hit his head on the pavement. The defendant was charged with the intentional tort of battery. The Court in that case ruled that the defendant’s use of force was not excessive since the defendant, on numerous occasions, asked the plaintiff to calm down, and the plaintiff instead became physical with the defendant by pushing him. The court stated that since the plaintiff was intoxicated and belligerent towards the defendant it was reasonable for him to believe that the plaintiff was a reasonable threat therefore his force in defending himself was not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The carpet is a foreseeable factor as the walkway can have these wrinkles. Furthermore, under Judge Andrew’s dissenting opinion, Myra can be part of the “any” consequences that naturally flow from defendant’s conduct. Thus, Myra may claim her proximate causation is satisfied. Plaintiff must prove actual damages for there to be negligence claim. Otherwise, there can be no negligence claim.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Implied assumption of risk has no formal/explicit agreement but the facts of the matter indicate the plaintiff was aware of the risk and voluntarily chose/agreed to accept the risk. Primary implied assumption of risk involves activities that are unavoidable/inherently dangerous. The person who voluntarily engages in these inherently dangerous activities, with full knowledge of the danger, cannot collect tort damages if one of the inherent risks occurs. Our week #5 (“Defense and Damages,” n.d.) video teaches the viewer that primary assumption of risk is not an actually a negligence liability defense.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lawsuit also gives a detailed description of what happened during the accident. It states that when the vehicle crashed and dismantled Walker's seat belt jerked…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study of Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. [New Mexico District Court, Bernalillo County, New Mexico, 1994] Executive Summary The Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants case, also known as the hot coffee lawsuit, was a controversial case that happened in 1994, sparking debates across the United States over tort reform . The plaintiff of the case, a woman in her late 70s named Stella Liebeck, was awarded 2.86 million dollars after suffering horrendous third degree burns across her pelvic region. The burns were caused by coffee that was served at over 80°C, scalding Liebeck’s skin in mere seconds after the drink was spilled.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Case Study

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although University Heights did not drive the vehicle that hit Alice’s car, they are responsible for not terminating Donald after the previous times he was caught speeding and deviating from delivery to visit his girlfriend. Donald got into the accident while on company time, making the business equally responsible for his actions. Alice’s case against Donald and University Heights is based on negligence. Donald lacked the care to change his driving patterns, and University Heights lacked the care to change their employees. Therefore, both defendants remain liable for the accident that injured Alice and left her with medical bills and the inability to…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays