Sometimes referred to as transnational cooperation. Such organization have their offices/factories in different countries and have a centralized office management. The policies implemented are all similar and effective in all the branches. Opponents of the multinational cooperation continues to refute and argue that they are too large and have much influence in the country. Multinational cooperation have help provide resources especially …show more content…
Financial capacity: Multinational companies have generated funds in one country and make use of the funds in another countries for smooth operation in all the nation’s branches.
CULTURE SHOCK EXPERIENCED BY MANAGERS WHO WORK ABROAD
Attitude and Behavior: Managers going abroad should have it in mind human and societal behavior is different and influenced business operation especially when there is diversity in race, colour and ethnicity behavioral approaches towards them. Managers from European nationals to west Africa Change in attitude. There are cases of abduction of European nationals working with Shell and Mobil in the south-south region of Nigeria.
Custom and Religion: Cultural differences really affected the living off Managers who have contracted job abroad. The custom of the host country is quite different from their home country which they find difficult to cope with people around them. Religion of the host country might differs from the Managers home country, this has caused alienation on them. In cases of Managers going to Turkey from the United states experience religion diversity as the Turkish are predominant muslim and this might arouse …show more content…
The management in the United States familiarize themselves with one of these style- directive, participative, empowering,charismatic,or celebrity. Japanese is regarded as a country with high power distance, moderately collectivist, more feminine, low uncertainty avoidance and long term orientated. Globalization has forced Japan to embrace norms and values that are globally enhanced and standardized. Directive, supportive and rewarding system is administered and being practice just because the Japanese has their own mentor relationship system “sempai-kohai” which is not present in the style of the United States. This relationship system tends to develop the personal bonds between the management and the surbodinates. The participative style is not usually appriopriate because the power distance between the leaders and followers is relatively high. Rewarding is more prevalence to punishing in the Japan due to the cultural value and loyalty to the organization but in the United states, reward and punishment is really effective.
THE MANAGERIAL CULTURE OF THE UNITED STATES
Business is consider the topmost priority. They transact business with the believes of given the highest value for the lower price without any prejudice on personal relationships. They believe being direct is a virtue, there Yes is Yes and No is No. American also expect all interaction