Multi Party System

Decent Essays
What makes up an election is dependent on the various options the people have of choosing from. In politics, more parties means more opinions, which means more options for those who chose to vote. This can be seen as a constructive thing as the voter can decide from various opinions between the political parties. Or quite possibly deconstructive as having various dominant parties has a much higher chance of leading to a minority government, depending on how the countries system works. In Canada, there are many parties that have the ability to run, however only five of them are ever in the picture. They consist of, Conservatives, Liberals, NDP, Bloc and the Green party. As previously mentioned, this allows for various opinions but can also be deconstructive due to the possibility of a minority government. …show more content…
Although Canada’s multi-party system has its potential flaws, it still proves to be superior over that of the United States. This is due to the fact that having multiple parties allows for fluctuation between left leaning, right leaning and more neutral governments. This is much more applicable then the American system who really only have two options. The republicans who are on the far right, and democrats who are solid left, meaning there is no political party that is anywhere near the centre. Options in an election is what gives the system purpose. Although Canada’s multiple party system show few flaws, it still proves to be much more efficient then that of the United States. Another example that reinstates this argument lies in the subtopic of who watches over the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Coalition between the Liberal-Conservatives in Canada West and Le Parti bleu in Canada East was nearly fair by the Coalition of the Reform Party of Canada West and Le Parti rouge of Canada East. The Coalition government…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maple syrup influences Canada. Similarly, Quebec influences Canada as well. To sum up, many politicians will use method to win whatever they want, but sometimes they may forget what do they citizens want. Some politicians want to get right for their people, but actually they win the benefit for themselves.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An electoral reform is a change in the electoral system of a country in order to improve how public desires are expressed in an election. An electoral reform is necessary for Canada’s democracy in the 21st century since the current system does not accurately represent people’s choice. By analyzing the pros and cons from the different recommendations on proportional representation (PR), I will prove how this new electoral system is a better option for Canadians over the current one, first-past-the-post (FPTP). Background…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Michael Den Tandt's article: "Race to the middle: Rhetoric aside, the major parties have near unanimity on key policies" discusses the lack of ideological differences that exist amongst Canadian political party leaders in their upcoming election campaigns. He argues that the party platforms of the NDP, Liberals, and Conservatives are similar in that they all explicitly speak of the need to implement policies that support the middle class. The article argues that the votes usually come down to a "relatively small cohort of swing voters who are apolitical, not interested in the process and liable to vote their family's economic interest first. " This is why he claims that we see policies on all three sides merging together to gain votes from…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gerrymanding Advantages

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Canada the Single Member Plurality electoral system is used when voting during elections. Politics, Power and the Common Good by Mintz, Close and Croci define this system as “an electoral system in which voters in each electoral district elect a single representative to the legislature. The candidate with the most votes is elected, even if that candidate did not receive the majority of votes.” (Ch7, pg. 147) This is a system that is simple to administer and the candidate that gets the most votes than the others is declared the winner.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, he briefly describes five key flaws in the Canadian political system. For example, Clark points to the fact that Canadian federal politics lacks competition. Second, he makes the claim that two important functions are not being performed. These functions are: “holding the people in power accountable and offering electors an acceptable place to turn” (Clark 2004: 400). Third, he argues that certain political actors do not have much influence…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Considering the rapid changes and unique political views in Quebec, it was only natural for new political parties to emerge. Currently within the past ten years two major parties have emerged, the Coalition Avenir Quebec and the Quebec Solidaire. The Coalition Avenir Quebec 3, founded in 2011, is a party made for Quebec nationalists which promotes the idea of Quebec’s distinct identity, but not secession. Whereas the Quebec Solidaire are similar but promote Quebec’s secession 1. The growing nationalism which caused the birth of these parties, made their voice heard on a country-wide basis.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The explanation for what it means to be liberal or conservative comes down to the ideological differences between them. Each party holds a standard to their basic principles and these lists are the primary ideological differences between Canada’s Conservative and Liberal parties. The focal differences amongst each party fall upon their views of society and its importance to the state, versus what the states significance to society is. To be Conservative is to maintain a center to right-wing view. Their economic opinions are…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a country as expansive and as culturally diverse as Canada, many different political opinions and parities can be found across the country. One of the more inclusive political parties is the United Party of Canada; a party created to represent all Canadians no matter who they are or what their situation is. The United Party, for short, has come to existence to bring unity and understanding between the values, needs and interests of all the minorities and majorities in Canada. The United Party of Canada was established in November 2009 by founder, Brian Jedan.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are significant flaws with the electoral districts, candidates do not have to win a majority in order to win the election and this system encourages tactical voting. With over 60% of voters not being represented by the current majority government, the process of reforming the electoral system should begin soon to give these people a voice in their government (“Results of the Canadian federal election,…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas government where one party controls both houses of the Texas State Legislature and the governorship are responsible for causing divisions in society by being "too partisan" or representing too many diverse interest, because they do not stand for anything. Being a one party, Texas cause people to live with consequences by segregating a way of life, because of how like-minded people are. This causes political problems, because there is no understanding for people who cannot conceive this lifestyle. Political parties function as a mode for which politicians can identify with a group that represents certain ideologies or certain citizen demographics. One-party dominance can greatly determine outcomes of elections and forcefully shape the…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The move to actualize some type of electoral change is politically divisive. Since change stands to influence the quantity of seats each party wins in an election, the move to some system can seemingly profit at least one parties above others. Now and again, proposition have surfaced for changes to Canada's electoral system. More often than not, these include some variation of proportional representation, albeit some have contended for a particular ballot to guarantee that applicants chose have the support of a larger part of voters. At the government level, these have dependably been rejected.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Debates about the Canadian electoral system are in no way new, with concerns being specifically brought to light as more people are concerned about the fairness of the current system to minority groups,…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a parliamentary government, majority of Canadian and non-Canadian citizens lack the knowledge to fully comprehend the logistics of the Canadian government and the electoral system. So when former Prime Minister Stephen Harper called an early election on August 2015, many did not understand its significance on the upcoming election. Harper believed that an early election would give him the advantage over other party leaders and would help him stay in office, but he was wrong. Despite the clever nature of this decision, where the timing conveniently worked with the newly passed Fair Elections Act and the Mike Duffy trial, the Conservatives faced devastating loss against the Liberals which can be greatly attributed to the Canada being a parliamentary…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Party Essay

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the contrary, the Democratic Party is a more liberal type of system, focusing on how the times change and so should the government to fit the era. According to the Democratic Party, the government is a tool to help the citizens who are in need and should have access to those benefits. The Democrat’s view is that the government should cut down on military spending to reduce the national debt. They also work on a more efficient way to help immigrants settle in the United States. While the parties may differ on what opinion is right, they talk about the same points and at times work together to solve an…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays