Multani Case Study

Decent Essays
In conclusion, the Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys case brought an importance debate on the ban of kirpan in school. The final decision made by the Supreme court judges is sound and logical with the only exception that even though they declared that there is a different between constitutional and administrative law, they still failed to compromise both. The Multani case also strengthened Canadians point of view of multiculturalism. In the beginning, the concept of multiculturalism was viewed negatively. Cases such as the Multani one helped to bring positive view on this concept. And finally, this case also led to the creation of Bouchard-Taylor commission and it made Quebec realize the need of reasonable accommodation.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Canada case in a way in which the facts are stated accurately. However, there is the possibility that a legal positivist would also explain this case in a more biased manner by considering Ms. Baker’s arguments as extraneous. By understanding how this perspective would approach this case, the connection between morality and the law can be found in the ratio, and the significance of procedural fairness can be seen as articulated through the basic rule or principle in the case. A legal positivist would agree with a majority of the courts’ assessments, except the Supreme Court of Canada’s assessment; however, the assessment of a legal positivist could also be considered as incorrect. Yet, if the legal positivist were to look at this case through a slightly different view, they would agree with the Supreme Court’s assessment and be considered correct.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calder Case Summary

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Calder V. British Columbia Attorney General [1973] SCR 313 Calder case is a pacesetter for aboriginal jurisprudence in Canadian supreme court. It is the first to recognize that aboriginal title to land exist as a sui generis type of right in Canada at the time of time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763 and does not devolve from the colonial, Crown law, treaty or statute. The main issue for determination in this case was whether Crown authority lawfully extinguished the aboriginal title to the ancestral land occupied by the Nisga’a tribe that pre-existed at the time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763. The case was ended as a deadlock, the court split three to three in favor and against the appeal, while the seventh judge dismissed…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The Canadian Constitution, also known as the supreme law, describe Canada’s process of both codified and uncodified traditions as well as convention. It allows for the division of powers between federal and provincial powers and encompasses the rights and freedoms of all Canadians. The Meech Lake Accord was the first attempt to amend the newly patriated Constitution in order to facilitate changes depicted by the Constitution Act, 1982. The Meech Lake Accord was a set of constitutional amendments designed to persuade Quebec to accept the Canada Act. The accord was proposed by both Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and premier of Quebec, Robert Bourassa.…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Hauser Case Study

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While studying the case R. v Hauser, it is clear to see why it is known to be one of the leading constitutional decisions in understanding the workings of Peace, order and good governments in relation to a power struggle of jurisdiction. The whole case surrounds the question on whether the Attorney General, or the Attorney General of Canada should have the power to control the prosecution under the Federal Narcotics Control Act. It is a battle for powers of jurisdiction in regards to the criminal code, and more so the Narcotics Control Act; (NCA), 1961. The Narcotics Act was once Canada’s national drug control statue prior to its repeal in 1996 where the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act took its place. The NCA upheld an international treaty which prohibited the production, and supply of specific drugs; normally narcotics, unless given a licence for specific…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the hallmarks of Stephen Harper’s tenure as Prime Minister was the adversarial relationship between Parliament and the courts. His government was “openly hostile towards the judicial branch” and often failed to take its Charter duties seriously. Harper’s lack of deference for the right and freedoms entrenched in the Charter led to several of his government’s laws being struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Conversely, the appeal of Frank v. Canada was a victory for the Conservative government – although the impugned legislation had been enacted over a decade before Harper became Prime Minister. It is still possible for the challenged sections of the Canada Elections Act to be declared unconstitutional, however, as the case is being appealed in the SCC.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, the political impact this case had was can a provincial act over reach their boundaries and maybe even frustrate parliament and get away with it? The case stated that the decision made by the judges favored s.6 of the provincial act over s.30 of the federal act because it fufilled the purpose more than s. 30. It led to many questions raised in this case, in whereby how far can provinces can enact their regulations in so far it does not frustrate the federal enactment. The doctrine of paramountcy is one of great complexity and requires a great analysis in truly to understand it, especially when bringing it up to court. It requires knowledge about both provincial and federal powers.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Tran, 2010 SCC 58

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the foundation of Canadian Law in our society. It keeps the criminals at bay, and the innocent free. In my opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada does it’s job in upholding a high standard of effectiveness and success. It effectively balances the rights of individuals against the needs of society The case R v. Tran, 2010 SCC 58, [2010] 3 S.CE. 350 clearly portrays the effectiveness of the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Singh V. Canada Case Study

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Singh v. Canada, Minister of Employment and Immigration, 1985, the Supreme Court of Canada gave everyone who is physically present on Canadian soil the same Charter rights and protections as Canadian citizen. After this decision, it brought on many changes in the refugee system causing many problems to arise in our society. This decision was incorrect, as it endangers our citizens, encourages and benefits illegals, it costs out government millions of unnecessary dollars, and takes away from the protections of legitimate refugees in need of real help. This court case was between Mr. Singh and the Minister of Employment and Immigration.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in Canada, the final court of appeal, and the last legal resort for all litigants; therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions are the ultimate expression and application of Canadian law (Supreme Court of Canada tour). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in the R v. Keegstra case regarding the freedom of expression portrays the theoretical concepts behind the court’s ruling as it is the job of the court to deliver a fair decision to the parties involved, as well as a decision that maintains law and order in society. The R v. Keegstra ruling contains insights from the consensus theory and the labelling theory, as the decision of the court was in the interest of the public. To better understand a criminal law case and come up with a conclusion, the theory used must have a valid structure and must follow the rules of critical thinking and logic (Boyd, Cartwright and Heidt, 2015: 120). Also, the purpose of the criminal law must be understood as criminal law serves a purpose, which takes into account some theoretical aspects of the consensus theory and…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does subsection 17(5) of the Act constitute an ameliorative law or program within meaning of s. 15(2) of the Charter? No. Subsection 17(5) of the Act does not establish an ameliorative law to make the conditions of Canadian Aboriginals better within the context of s. 15(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It takes away the right of other ethnic groups and races from being able to adopt an aboriginal child and is possibly subject to racial discrimination. If it is meant to improve conditions for aboriginals, it may be doing the opposite for other groups of people that are specifically not of aboriginal descent. Subsection 17(5) of the Act states that aboriginal adoption consent is not subject to the section 17(1) of the act,…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For many years the Indians have been challenging the government about how off-reserve Indians, “Métis”, were not granted the same rights as on-reserve Indians under The Constitution. The Federal Court made decision to grant off-reserve “Indians” the same rights under the constitution seeing as they had grown up and respect and live by this culture. The president of the Women of the Métis Nation states "we will no longer be a part of the political football that has us being tossed back and forth between the province and the federal government. " Many off-reserve “Indians” have been very largely impacted by this decision because it will allow them to get the help and status they need to preserve their families. Before off-reserve Indians were granted these rights they were always told they were a provincial problem but when they had gone to the province asking for their rights to be granted they sent them to the Federal government as a purview.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, the language used by John A. Macdonald in the Legislative Assembly when describing the formation of a united Canada refers to a union for the benefit of people of “the same blood and lineage” which has obvious racial and cultural implications. The residential school system, the early iterations of the Indian Act that were pioneers…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based off the history of indigenous peoples in Canada, one thing is for certain; discriminatory and inhumane acts by European conquest, towards a unique culture has altered the Aboriginal way of life we see in Canada today. While the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), has been evolving and developing for multiple years, these 94 recommendations give important insight and suggestions in how the nation of Canada can move away from this unjust history, reconcile and work towards becoming a stronger nation. While it may seem that reparations are impractical from the devastations of such events as the Indian residential schools, the TRC has been a timely process with the intent to restore an altered Aboriginal life and strengthen ties with…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nevertheless, before discussing how effective the multiculturalism act has been, it’s necessary to discuss parts of Canadian identity, and asses how multiculturalism shapes Canadian society. Canadian identity is ambiguous; often been describes described as an inclusive nation, rather than exclusive nation. Instead of promoting its own interest Canada has been known as a compromising, pace-making, compassionate nation filled with virtue. Canadian identity is closely associated with the promotion of diversity and multiculturalism. Unlike their American neighbors in the South, Canada is said to have embraced distinct cultures and language, without forcing in assimilation.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays