Mtiur Bahman Nizami Case Study

In the chief prosecutor vs Motiur Rahman Nizami the tribunal found that Motiur Rahman Nizami was the president of ICS exercised his prominent position in transforming Islami Chhatra Sangha into Al-Badr Bahini to know the consequences of his actions that he basically encouraged, Members of Al-Bahr Bahini to commit crimes against humanity, including genocidal killings of intellectuals all over Bangladesh. The accused have superior power, a position and a real influence on Al-Badr is a proper indication of support that has had a causal relationship with members of Al-Badr and its subordinates who have effective control over them. Therefore, it is not possible to alleviate responsibility for the alleged crimes committed by members of Al-Badr Bahini with whom he had de-facto superior-subordinate relationship. It is clear that during the war of liberation, the defendant gave a lot of provocative speeches to ICS members who eventually became members of Al-Badr Bahini and committed crimes against humanity at random.
The accused as chief of Al-Badr Bahini exercised his superior status but he never tried to prevent his subordinates from committing atrocities. …show more content…
Perceiving the inevitable defeat of the auxiliary forces accused invited Pakistan's then president to supply more weapons to his followers who committed genocide and crimes against humanity throughout the country. Failure to recover the defendant destined to end up conspired with others to kill the intellectuals which continued until December 16,